ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

The Influence of Hydration on the Viscoelastic Properties of Soft Tissues, Pain and Mobility of Patients

NCT07915167, Not applicable, Enrolling by invitation, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleThe Influence of Hydration on the Viscoelastic Properties of Soft Tissues, Pain and Mobility of PatientsClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07915167ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusEnrolling by invitationClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment80 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorThe Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in KatowiceClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsLow Back Pain (LBP), Fascial Manipulation, Hydration, Mobility Decline, Jumping Performance, Bioimpedance Measurement Capacity, FasciaClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionshydration, Stecco's Fascial Manipulation therapy, Stecco Fascial Manipulation Therapy + Hydration, Simulated non-interventional soft-tissue therapyClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryVisual Analog Scale (VAS)From the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), consisting of a 100-mm horizontal line anchored by two endpoints: 0 mm, indicating "no pain," and 100 mm, indicating "worst pain imaginable. The distance from the zero point to the participant's mark was measured in millimetres, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryOswestry QuestionnaireFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Disability related to low back pain was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index, version 2.1a (ODI 2.1a). The questionnaire consists of 10 sections assessing pain intensity and the impact of low back pain on activities of daily living, including personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, and travelling. Each section is scored from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The scores from all completed sections are summed and expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score, ranging from 0% to 100%. Higher ODI scores indicate a greater level of disability associated with low back pain.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryHydrationFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Water intake was assessed using an individual water intake questionnaire provided to each participant at the beginning of the study. Participants were instructed to record the amount of water consumed, expressed in millilitres (mL), at specified time points throughout the study period. Each participant was required to complete the questionnaire on an ongoing basis and record their water intake at the designated times. Upon completion of the study, the questionnaires were collected from all participants, and the recorded values were reviewed and summarized to determine the total water intake and the pattern of water consumption during the study period.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryVertical jumpFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Vertical jump performance was assessed using the Squat Jump (SJ) test with the Chronojump measurement system. Jump height was recorded using the Chronojump system based on the measured flight time and is specified in centimeters \[cm\]. The obtained results were recorded for each participant and subsequently analyzed to assess lower-limb explosive performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryArmstrong's Urine Colour ChartFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Hydration status was additionally assessed using Armstrong's Urine Colour Chart. Participants were instructed to compare the colour of their urine with the standardized colour scale provided by the chart and to record the corresponding score. The chart consists of eight colour categories ranging from very pale yellow to dark brown, with lower scores indicating lighter urine colour and better hydration status, while higher scores indicate darker urine colour and a greater likelihood of dehydration.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryUrine assessment using diagnostic test stripsFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Urine parameters were assessed using commercially available urine diagnostic test strips. Urine samples were collected from each participant at the designated time points during the study period. The test strip was immersed in the urine sample according to the manufacturer's instructions and subsequently evaluated after the specified reaction time. The obtained results were used to assess selected urine parameters related to hydration status, including urine specific gravity and other relevant biochemical indicators.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryWater and Fluid Intake Habits Questionnaire (NAS)From the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
The questionnaire was administered prior to the commencement of any intervention in order to characterize participants' baseline hydration-related habits and usual fluid consumption. The questionnaire included questions regarding the usual amount and frequency of fluid intake, the types of beverages consumed, and participants' subjective hydration-related habits and symptoms potentially associated with insufficient fluid intake.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryMuscle ToneFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Soft tissue properties were assessed using the MyotonPRO device examined F - Natural Oscillation Frequency \[Hz\], characterizing Tone or Tension at the points specified earlier in the study description.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryStiffnessFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)Soft tissue biomechanics properties were assessed using the MyotonPRO device examined S - Dynamic Stiffness \[N/m\] at the points specified earlier in the study description.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryRelaxationFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)Soft tissue viscoelastic properties were assessed using the MyotonPRO device examined R - Mechanical Stress Relaxation Time \[ms\] at the points specified earlier in the study description.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryBMIFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)To calculate BMI, need parameters such as height in centimeters \[cm\] and body weight in kilograms \[kg\]ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPhysical activityFrom the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)
Determining the level of overall weekly physical activity using the PAL (Physical Activity Level) coefficient. * Extremely inactive / Bed Rest: \< 1.2 - 1.4 (Confined to bed, minimal movement) * Sedentary: 1.40 - 1.69 (Seated work, office jobs, little or no strenuous leisure, \~7,500 steps/day) * Moderately Active: 1.70 - 1.99 (Standing/walking work, or seated work plus \~1 hour of daily exercise like running/brisk walking) * Vigorously / Heavily Active: 2.00 - 2.40 (Heavy physical/agricultural labor, construction, or 2+ hours of intense daily training) * Extremely Active: \> 2.40 (Competitive endurance athletes, heavy double-daily training regimens
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryTotal water content (TBW)From the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)Hydration status was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Total body water is calculated and expressed in liters \[L\] and as a percentage \[%\] of body mass.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryIntracellular water (ICW)From the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)Hydration status was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Distribution of water into intracellular and extracellular compartments, in liters \[L\] or kilograms \[kg\]ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryExtracellular water (ECW)From the time of inclusion in the study until its completion after 8 weeks (4 weeks + follow-up after 4 weeks)Hydration status was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Distribution of water into intracellular and extracellular compartments, in liters \[L\] or kilograms \[kg\]ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)