ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Evaluation of Large Language Models in Parasternal Block Ultrasound Interpretation

NCT07915206, Recruiting, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital

Trial 9

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEvaluation of Large Language Models in Parasternal Block Ultrasound InterpretationClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07915206ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment32 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorKanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsParasternal BlockClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsMultimodal Large Language Model-Based Ultrasound AssessmentClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryCorrect Local Anesthetic DepositionDuring the ultrasound-guided block procedure
The accuracy of ChatGPT and Gemini in determining whether the local anesthetic solution was deposited within the intended fascial plane will be evaluated using ultrasound recordings. Model assessments will be compared with the expert reference assessment. Accuracy will be calculated as the percentage of correctly classified recordings.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAnatomical Identification AccuracyDuring the ultrasound-guided block procedure
The ability of ChatGPT and Gemini to correctly identify anatomical structures visible in parasternal intercostal plane block ultrasound recordings will be evaluated against expert anesthesiologist assessments. Anatomical identification performance will be scored using predefined criteria.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNeedle Tip PositionDuring the ultrasound-guided block procedure
The accuracy of ChatGPT and Gemini in determining whether the needle tip is located within the intended fascial plane will be compared with the expert reference assessment. Results will be reported as the percentage of correctly classified recordings.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryLocal Anesthetic SpreadDuring the ultrasound-guided block procedure
The ability of each model to classify local anesthetic spread as superficial or deep and identify the observed spread pattern will be compared with expert assessments. Classification accuracy will be reported as a percentage.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryProcedural Risk IdentificationDuring the ultrasound-guided block procedure
The ability of each model to identify potential procedural risks involving adjacent anatomical structures, including the internal mammary vessels and pericardium, will be evaluated against expert assessments. Accuracy will be reported as the percentage of correctly classified recordings.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryClinical Recommendation QualityDuring the ultrasound-guided block procedure
The appropriateness of recommendations regarding inadequate local anesthetic spread, corrective actions, and additional injection will be assessed by an independent expert anesthesiologist using a predefined scoring system ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater clinical appropriateness.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAgreement With Expert AssessmentDuring the ultrasound-guided block procedure
Agreement between ChatGPT, Gemini, and expert anesthesiologist assessments will be evaluated for predefined ultrasound interpretation parameters. Agreement will be quantified using Cohen's kappa for applicable categorical assessments.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)