Generative AI-Based Evaluation of Clinical Thinking and Decision-Making in Medical Students
NCT07915622, Not applicable, Completed, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Trial 10
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Title | Generative AI-Based Evaluation of Clinical Thinking and Decision-Making in Medical Students | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| NCT number | NCT07915622 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Status | Completed | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Phases | Not applicable | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Enrollment | 90 participants, actual | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Lead sponsor | Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Conditions | Medical Education, Generative AI | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Interventions | AI-Assisted Teaching, Traditional Teaching | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| First posted | 2026-11-04 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Last updated | 2026-11-04 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Registered outcomes 4
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Clinical Reasoning Score on Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) | Baseline to Week 4 | The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better clinical thinking and decision-making ability | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) Between GAI-Based and Expert Assessment Scores | Baseline to Week 4 | Both Generative AI (GAI) and human experts will evaluate the participants using the clinical Reasoning Assessment Rubric. The agreement between the GAI-based scores and expert assessment scores will be evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) . The coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, where higher values indicate better agreement. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Time to Complete the Assessment | During the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment at Week 4 (completion time measured in minutes). | Assessment completion time is defined as the duration, measured in minutes, from the initiation of the clinical thinking and decision-making assessment to its final submission by the participant. The time will be automatically recorded by the evaluation platform. Each participant's assessment completion time will be measured during the assessment conducted at Week 4. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Participant Satisfaction Score on the GAI-Assisted Evaluation System | Week 4 | Participant satisfaction will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = Very Dissatisfied to 5 = Very Satisfied). A higher score indicates higher satisfaction with the GAI-assisted evaluation system. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Outcomes 0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as | Source |
|---|
Results by group 0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units | Source |
|---|
Participant flow 0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted | Source |
|---|
Adverse events 0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events | Source |
|---|
Adverse event totals 0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk | Source |
|---|
Papers 0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as | Source |
|---|
Grants 0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
| Project | Title | Principal investigators | Organization | Funder | Fiscal years | Source |
|---|
Trial comparisons 0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|
Tests 0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
| Test | Named as | Source |
|---|
Source 5
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Release | trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Release manifest SHA-256 | 0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Registry capture | 2026-11-12 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Results copy, AACT | 2026-03-23 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| NIH clinical studies file | 2026-11-13 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)