ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Proof-of-concept for Use of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation (TSS) With the ExaStim® Stimulation System in Adults With Chronic Ischemic Stroke

NCT07917221, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleProof-of-concept for Use of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation (TSS) With the ExaStim® Stimulation System in Adults With Chronic Ischemic StrokeClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07917221ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment5 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorCasa Colina Hospital and Centers for HealthcareClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsChronic Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)ClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsTranscutaneous Spinal StimulationClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryFugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity - Motor Score (FMA-UE)Initial assessment at enrollment, re-assessment at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 17
The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment is a 66-point stroke-specific scale measuring sensorimotor recovery across reflexes, synergies, isolated movements, wrist stability, hand function, and coordination. Each item is scored from 0 to 2 based on performance completeness and compensation. Changes exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (typically 4 to 10 points) reflect meaningful gains in motor control and functional independence.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAction Research Arm Test (ARAT)Initial assessment at enrollment, re-assessment at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 17
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) is a 57-point, 19-item observational assessment measuring upper extremity functional capacity and dexterity across grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement subscales. Each task is scored from 0 to 3 based on completion time, movement quality, and compensation patterns. A score change exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (typically 6 to 10 points) indicates meaningful improvement in real-world arm and hand function.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryBox-and-Blocks Test (BBT)Initial assessment at enrollment, at the start of each treatment session, and during re-assessment visits at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 17
The Box and Block Test measures unilateral gross manual dexterity by recording the number of one-inch wooden blocks a patient can transport over a partition from one compartment to another in 60 seconds. The scoring system simply counts the total number of successfully transferred blocks per hand, with multiple blocks carried simultaneously counting as a single point. An increase in score exceeding the minimal detectable change (typically around 6 or more blocks for stroke populations) indicates a true, statistically significant improvement in hand transport speed and unilateral functional capacity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondary9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT)Initial assessment at enrollment, at the start of each treatment session, and during re-assessment visits at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 17
The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) measures manual dexterity and finger-movement speed by recording the total seconds required for a patient to place and subsequently remove nine pegs into a board. Scoring is based on timing (seconds per trial), where lower times indicate better performance, or converted to "pegs per second" for rate-based analysis. A change in score exceeding the minimal detectable change (typically a reduction of several seconds or roughly 15 to 20% from baseline) indicates a statistically significant improvement in fine motor speed and coordination.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryVisual Analog Scale (VAS) for painInitial assessment at enrollment, at the end of each treatment session, and during re-assessment visits at weeks 4, 8, and 12
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measures subjective symptom intensity, such as pain, using a continuous horizontal line anchored by "no symptom" at one end and "worst imaginable symptom" at the other. Patients mark their perceived level, and the score is quantified from 0 to 10, where higher numbers reflect greater symptom severity. A score change exceeding a 2 point change indicates a clinically meaningful improvement or worsening of the patient's symptom experience.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherMotor Activity Log (MAL)Initial assessment at enrollment, re-assessment at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 17
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a structured, semi-structured clinical interview where stroke survivors rate their actual daily arm use in terms of Amount of Use (AOU) and How Well (HW) they perform 30 real-world functional tasks. Each item is scored on a 0-to-5 ordinal scale, ranging from 0 (not used at all) to 5 (used as well as before the stroke), with final scores derived from the average of all items. A change in score exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (typically around 1.0 to 1.1 points for either subscale) indicates a meaningful, real-world translation of laboratory motor gains into spontaneous, daily spontaneous arm use.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherStroke Impact Scale (SIS)Initial assessment at enrollment, re-assessment at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 17
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating health-related quality of life across eight domains, including strength, hand function, ADLs, mobility, communication, emotion, memory, and participation. Each item is scored on a 1-to-5 ordinal scale, which is then transformed into a standardized 0-to-100 scale per domain, where higher scores reflect better recovery and fewer stroke-related limitations. A score change exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (typically ranging from about 3 to 17 points depending on the specific domain) indicates a statistically reliable and meaningful improvement in the patient's perceived recovery and daily well-being.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherModified Ashworth Scale (MAS)Initial assessment at enrollment, re-assessment at week 12
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), it grades spasticity and muscle hypertonia on a 6-point ordinal scale from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid limb in flexion or extension). A decrease in score indicates a reduction in passive resistance and muscle hypertonia, reflecting successful management of spasticity.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 20

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
4033651BACKGROUNDPubMed
7659438BACKGROUNDPubMed
22282773BACKGROUNDPubMed
25239073BACKGROUNDPubMed
33652677BACKGROUNDPubMed
33840592BACKGROUNDPubMed
33894832BACKGROUNDPubMed
35426510BACKGROUNDPubMed
35522473BACKGROUNDPubMed
36787001BACKGROUNDPubMed
36807682BACKGROUNDPubMed
37742304BACKGROUNDPubMed
38174129BACKGROUNDPubMed
38561821BACKGROUNDPubMed
40139703BACKGROUNDPubMed
40895113BACKGROUNDPubMed
41054846BACKGROUNDPubMed
41094520BACKGROUNDPubMed
41875181BACKGROUNDPubMed
42287562BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)