ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Metabolic Profiling Among Patients Suspected of Infective Endocarditis - PPSIE Comparing Metabolomes of Bloodstream Infections Versus Infective Endocarditis

NCT07917325, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, University Hospital, Angers

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleMetabolic Profiling Among Patients Suspected of Infective Endocarditis - PPSIE Comparing Metabolomes of Bloodstream Infections Versus Infective EndocarditisClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07917325ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment240 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversity Hospital, AngersClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsInfective Endocarditis (IE)ClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsBlood sampleClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-04ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryMetabolomic signatureDay 1 and Day 5 after enrollement
The existence of a metabolic signature will be confirmed by the presence of a latent variable predictive of cardiac involvement in the study population. This variable will be selected after comparing the metabolic profiles between the 'confirmed EI' group and the Bacteremia Without Cardiac Involvement (BaSAC) group for each time point considered (Day 1 and Day 5). To avoid overfitting, the predictive ability of the multivariate model (orthogonal partial least squares in the context of discriminant analysis, or OPLS-DA) will be evaluated using "standard" criteria as implemented in the SIMCA software, with a low prediction error rate (Q2Ycum ≥ 0.5) and performance significantly superior to that of the random model (P-value (CV-ANOVA) ≤ 0.05, Q2Ycum from the permutation test \< 0).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryIdentify potential biomarkers (BM) that can distinguish patients with BaSAC from those with EI.Day 1 and Day 5 after enrollement
Metabolites, as well as the ratio(s) or sum(s) of metabolites, with a median value that is significantly different between the two groups (BaSAC and EI) will be considered potential BMs for EI, after adjusting for potential sources of confounding (center, germ, etc.) and after correcting for Type I error inflation. The potential BM(s) may or may not be part of the metabolomic signature (see Primary Objective), as applicable.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDescribe changes in the metabolic signature in patients with endocarditis 5 days and 3 months after enrollment and correlate these changes with the diagnosis of IE.Day 1, Day 5, and Month 3 after enrollment
Proportion of patients in the endocarditis group in whom normalization of the metabolic signature was observed during follow-up (Day 5). Comparison of metabolite concentrations in the same patient across samples collected on Day 1, Day 5, and Month 3 to identify statistically significant changes in the levels of metabolites of interest. Normalization defined as a correlation with the normalization of clinical, laboratory, and microbiological parameters.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDiagnostic performance of the identified biomarker(s) in a subset of patients with "possible" endocarditis according to the Duke classification revised by the ISCVID in 2023.Day 1, Day 5, and Month 3 after enrollment
Calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the identified biomarker(s) for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis at each time point considered (Day 1, Day 5, and Month 3). A panel of experts will serve as the gold standard for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Secondary
Conduct a sensitivity analysis on the correct classification of patients as "definite IE" according to the Duke classification revised by the ISCVID in 2023 by comparing it with the Duke and Li classification.
Month 3 after enrollmentcalculation of the proportion of discordant cases between "definite IE" cases according to the Duke classification revised by the ISCVID in 2023 and the Duke and Li classification.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)