ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effect of Glo Germ Visual Feedback on Surgical Hand Antisepsis in Nursing Students

NCT07918144, Not applicable, Completed, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffect of Glo Germ Visual Feedback on Surgical Hand Antisepsis in Nursing StudentsClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07918144ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment46 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorZonguldak Bulent Ecevit UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsSurgical Hand AntisepsisClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsGlo Germ-Based Visual Feedback Training, Conventional Surgical Hand Antisepsis TrainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-05ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-05ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimarySurgical Hand Antisepsis Skill PerformanceImmediately after training and at 1-month follow-up
Surgical hand antisepsis skill performance was assessed using an 18-item observational checklist evaluating the correct execution of surgical hand antisepsis procedures. Each correctly performed step was scored as 1, and each incorrectly performed or omitted step was scored as 0. Total scores ranged from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating better surgical hand antisepsis performance. Assessments were conducted immediately after training and at the one-month follow-up.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySurgical Hand Antisepsis KnowledgeBaseline, immediately after training, and at 1-month follow-up
Knowledge of surgical hand antisepsis was assessed using a 15-item knowledge assessment form. Total scores ranged from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of surgical hand antisepsis. Knowledge was assessed at baseline, immediately after training, and at the one-month follow-up.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPercentage of Anatomical Hand CleanlinessImmediately after training (intervention group only) and at 1-month follow-up (both groups)
Anatomical hand cleanliness was assessed using Glo Germ fluorescent training lotion and ultraviolet light. The anatomical regions of the hands and forearms were examined to identify areas with inadequate coverage during surgical hand antisepsis training. The assessment results were calculated and expressed as percentages. Higher percentages indicated better anatomical hand cleanliness. Assessments were performed immediately after training in the intervention group and at the one-month follow-up in both groups.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 19

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
15383395BACKGROUNDPubMed
17695343BACKGROUNDPubMed
21487344BACKGROUNDPubMed
23805438BACKGROUNDPubMed
33341066BACKGROUNDPubMed
34167397BACKGROUNDPubMed
35112944BACKGROUNDPubMed
36352489BACKGROUNDPubMed
36483347BACKGROUNDPubMed
36947854BACKGROUNDPubMed
38160107BACKGROUNDPubMed
38227588BACKGROUNDPubMed
38924975BACKGROUNDPubMed
38979741BACKGROUNDPubMed
38997187BACKGROUNDPubMed
39301983BACKGROUNDPubMed
39375684BACKGROUNDPubMed
41455950BACKGROUNDPubMed
41684361BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)