ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and a Modified Lumbopelvic Belt on Pain, Kinesiophobia, and Functional Status in Pregnant Women With Symphysis Pubis Pain

NCT07919548, Not applicable, Recruiting, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and a Modified Lumbopelvic Belt on Pain, Kinesiophobia, and Functional Status in Pregnant Women With Symphysis Pubis PainClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07919548ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment15 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorKahramanmaras Sutcu Imam UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsSymphysis Pubis Dysfunction, Pregnancy, Pregnancy ComplicationClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionseducational program, modified lumbopelvic beltClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-05ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-05ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryVAS pain assesmentFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Pain intensity will be assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates no pain, whereas a score of 10 indicates unbearable pain. The VAS is widely used to assess pain intensity. Pain intensity will be classified as mild (1-4), moderate (5-7), or severe (8-10). Pain in the lower back, back, and pelvic girdle will be assessed separately during activity, at rest, and during sleep at night.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPain threshold measurement (algometer)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
An algometer has long been used to measure soft-tissue pain associated with trigger points (11). An algometer will be used to assess the pressure pain threshold. The device has a blunt, non-sharp probe with a contact surface area of 1 cm². Pressure will be applied perpendicular to the midpoint of the muscle. Before the procedure, participants will be informed about the assessment and instructed to report when they first feel pain as the pressure is gradually increased. Measurements will be taken with the participant in a supine position. The pressure value at which the participant first experiences pain will be recorded as the pain threshold. Three measurements will be taken at 1-minute intervals, and the mean will be calculated (12). The assessment will be performed by applying pressure over the pubic symphysis.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryPelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The PGQ was developed by Stuge et al. (13). It is a condition-specific measure for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in individuals with pelvic girdle pain. It was developed for use in pregnant and postpartum individuals with pelvic girdle pain and can be used in both research and clinical practice. Its Turkish validity and reliability were established by Yelvar et al.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryOswestry Disability Index (ODI)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The ODI is a questionnaire developed specifically for individuals with low back pain to assess the degree of functional limitation in daily life. Its Turkish version has been tested for validity and reliability. It consists of 10 items addressing pain, personal care, lifting, standing, walking, sitting, traveling, sexual activity, and social life. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with 0 representing the best level of function and 5 the worst
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia was used to assess the severity of kinesiophobia in pregnant women. The TSK is a 17-item scale developed to measure fear of movement or reinjury. The original scale was developed by Miller, Kori, and Todd in 1991.The scale uses a four-point Likert response format: strongly disagree = 1, disagree = 2, agree = 3, and strongly agree = 4. To calculate the total score, items 4, 8, 12, and 16 are reverse-scored, and all item scores are summed. The total score ranges from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater kinesiophobia.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryWorld Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
The WHOQOL-BREF is a multidimensional self-report measure developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to assess quality of life from a biopsychosocial perspective. A shorter version of the original WHOQOL-100, it was published in 1998. The WHOQOL-BREF consists of 26 items covering four domains of quality of life: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Each item uses a five-point Likert scale to assess the respondent's perception of their quality of life over the previous two weeks. Scores are calculated separately for each domain and converted to a scale ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better quality of life. The WHOQOL-BREF enables comprehensive assessment of quality of life in both the general population and specific patient groups. It is widely used as a valid and reliable measure in health, psychology, rehabilitation, and public health research.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)