ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effectiveness of Sequential Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency Device for Facial Rejuvenation in Female Participants

NCT07919990, Not applicable, Completed, Cutis Medical Laser Clinics Pte Ltd

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffectiveness of Sequential Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency Device for Facial Rejuvenation in Female ParticipantsClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07919990ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment14 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorCutis Medical Laser Clinics Pte LtdClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsSkin LaxityClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsDENSITY sequential monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency deviceClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-05ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange from baseline in facial skin texture measured by AURA 3D imagingBaseline, Day 30, and Day 90Facial skin texture assessed from standardized three-dimensional facial images captured with the AURA 3D Imaging System (Hexagon Aura Reality AG) under standardized lighting and positioning.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange from baseline in facial pore appearance measured by AURA 3D imagingBaseline, Day 30, and Day 90Facial pore size and appearance assessed from standardized three-dimensional facial images captured with the AURA 3D Imaging System under standardized lighting and positioning.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange from baseline in facial contour measured by AURA 3D imagingBaseline, Day 30, and Day 90Facial contour assessed from standardized three-dimensional (3D) facial images captured with the AURA 3D Imaging System (Hexagon Aura Reality AG) under standardized lighting and positioning.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange from baseline in investigator-assessed skin laxity gradeBaseline, Day 30, and Day 90Facial skin laxity graded by the investigator using the Skin Laxity Scale. A lower grade indicates less skin laxity.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange from baseline in FACE-Q satisfaction scoresBaseline, Day 30, and Day 90
Participant-reported satisfaction with facial appearance and with skin, measured with FACE-Q patient-reported outcome scales. Scale scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryInvestigator-rated Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scoreDay 30 and Day 90Overall aesthetic improvement compared with baseline, rated by the investigator on the 5-point GAIS (very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse).ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryParticipant-rated Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scoreDay 30 and Day 90Overall aesthetic improvement compared with baseline, rated by the participant on the 5-point GAIS (very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, worse).ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of participants with adverse events and local skin reactionsDay 1 (immediately after treatment) through Day 90
Safety and tolerability, assessed as the number of participants with adverse events and with local skin reactions (such as erythema, edema, or discomfort) recorded immediately after treatment and at each follow-up visit.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)