ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Combined Effects of Novel Exercise and Stretching Exercise in Pregnant Females With Restless Leg Syndrome

NCT07921043, Not applicable, Completed, Riphah International University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleCombined Effects of Novel Exercise and Stretching Exercise in Pregnant Females With Restless Leg SyndromeClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07921043ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment44 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorRiphah International UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsRestless Leg SyndromeClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionsstretching and novel exercises, novel exercisesClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryNUMERIC PAIN RATING SCALE6 weeks
This tool is used to measure the pain intensity in individuals. It has eleven-point numeric scale ranges from zero to ten. If zero is no pain, then ten is severe pain. It has four levels to assess the pain quality: 0 is considered as no pain, one to 3 is considered as minor pain, four to six is moderate pain, and seven to 10 is considered as severe pain
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryQUALITY OF LIFE SCALE -SHORT FORM-126 weeks
SF-12 has 12 different items composed of eight separate headings consisting of subdivisions such as limitations related to physical restrictions, physical performance, ache vitality, emotional issues difficulty, social performance and mental wellness. It has two scores: the physical component summary score (PCS12) and the mental component summary score (MCS12. include general health physical functioning role physical and pain.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryGRONINGEN SLEEP QUALITY SCALE6 weeks
The Participant sleep routines and general quality of sleep are evaluated by using this measure. It has fifteen items with true or false values. All true things received one point, with the expectation of items eight, ten,\& twelve which had scores that were inverted .This scale scoring method is scores ranges from zero to fourteen 14 with the first question not being part of final value. It has three categories were created based on the total value normal refreshing sleep (score 0 to 2), slightly disturbed sleep" (value 3-9), \& poor quality of Sleep (10 to 14) significance
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRESTLESS LEG SYNDROME RATING SCALE6 weeks
It is a gold standard Scale. Each have ten questions on the test has a grade ranging from 0 to 4. The last five questions evaluate how affects the RLS on daily living activities or quality of life, while the first five questions should concentrate on the intensity of symptoms. The severity of disease is reflected in the total score. 40 are the highest possible score. Mild (1-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30), and extremely severe (31-40) are the total RLS severity scores significance
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)