ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Pilot Testing ACCOMPANI: A Nurse-Targeted Intervention to Promote Psychosocial Equity in Pediatric Oncology

NCT07921589, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitlePilot Testing ACCOMPANI: A Nurse-Targeted Intervention to Promote Psychosocial Equity in Pediatric OncologyClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07921589ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment80 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsPediatric Oncology, Childhood Cancers, Psychosocial CircumstancesClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsACCOMPANI Intervention, Usual CareClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryEnrollment Rate6 monthsEnrollment rate is defined as the proportion of approached nurses who enroll in the pilot randomized controlled trial.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryIntervention completion rateUp to 5 weeksCompletion will be defined as the proportion of enrolled participants who complete the post-intervention follow-up survey assessment.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryAcceptability of Intervention (AIM) RateAt post-intervention follow-up (T2), approximately 5 weeks after baseline.
The AIM assessment has 4 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). A higher score is greater perceived acceptability. An overall score for each participant is calculated as the mean of the responses to the 4 items. The AIM rate is the proportion of particpants who have an overall mean score of 4 or higher.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryAppropriateness of Intervention (IAM) RateAt post-intervention follow-up (T2), approximately 5 weeks after baseline.
The IAM assessment has 4 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = completely disagree to 5 = completely agree). A higher score is greater perceived appropriateness. An overall score for each participant is calculated as the mean of the responses to the 4 items. The IAM rate is the proportion of particpants who have an overall mean score of 4 or higher.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE) score from Baseline to Post-Intervention Follow-UpAt baseline and post-intervention follow-up (T2), up to approximately 5 weeks
The NGSE assessment has 8 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). A higher score is greater self-efficacy. An overall score for each participant is calculated as the mean of the responses to the 8 items. The change in NGSE score is the NGSE score at post-intervention follow-up less the NGSE score at baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals-Revised (IAPCC-R) score from Baseline to Post-Intervention Follow-UpAt baseline and post-intervention follow-up (T2), up to approximately 5 weeks
The IAPCC-R assessment has 25 items scored on a 4-point scale (1 = strongly agree to 4 = strongly disagree). A higher score is greater self-efficacy. An overall score for each participant is calculated with a range of 25-100. The change in IAPCC-R score is the IAPCC-R score at post-intervention follow-up less the IAPCC-R score at baseline.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDuration of Contact with Components of the InterventionWeekly up to 4 weeksThe duration of contact with components of the intervention is measured in minutes for each week and summed across all 4 sessions.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Components AccessedWeekly up to 4 weeksThe number of components accessed is counted for each week and summed across all 4 sessions.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Modules CompletedWeekly up to 4 weeksThe number of modules completed is counted for each week and summed across all 4 sessions.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Access AttemptsWeekly up to 4 weeksThe number of access attempts is counted for each week and summed across all 4 sessions.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)