ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Intralesional Metformin Versus Triamcinolone for Keloid Treatment

NCT07922616, Phase 2, Completed, Al-Azhar University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleIntralesional Metformin Versus Triamcinolone for Keloid TreatmentClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07922616ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPhase 2ClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment30 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorAl-Azhar UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsKeloidsClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsIntralesional Metformin, Intralesional Triamcinolone AcetonideClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange from baseline in the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) Score at Week 19Baseline and Week 19 (one month after the 6th treatment session)
• The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) evaluated scar vascularity (0 = normal, 1 = pink, 2 = red, 3 = purple), pigmentation (0 = normal, 1 = hypopigmentation, 2 = mixed, 3 = hyperpigmentation), pliability (0 = normal, 1 = supple, 2 = yielding, 3 = firm, 4 = ropes, 5 = contracture), and height (0 = flat, 1 = \<2mm, 2 = 2-5mm, 3 = \>5mm). Total scores ranged from 0 to 14, with 0 indicating normal skin and 14 indicating the most severe scarring. The reduction in the total VSS score was used to categorize treatment response into four clinical categories: poor (1-25% reduction), fair (26-50% reduction), good (51-75% reduction), or excellent (\>75% reduction). Changes were compared between metformin-treated and triamcinolone-treated lesions. Assessments were supported by standardized digital photographs obtained using Identical camera settings, lighting conditions, and patient positioning. Changes were compared between metformin-treated and triamcinolone-treated lesions.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Keloid Thickness and Length Assessed by Ultrasonography at Week 19Baseline and Week 19 (one month after the 6th treatment session)
Objective treatment efficacy was assessed by high-resolution ultrasonography using a Philips Affiniti 70 ultrasound system (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands) equipped with a 10-MHz linear-array transducer. The ultrasonographic parameters evaluated were keloid thickness and length, both measured in millimeters. The change was calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the final clinical score obtained at the assessment visit 1 month after the last (6th) treatment session. Changes were compared between metformin-treated and triamcinolone-treated lesions.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction Score at Week 19Week 19 (one month after the 6th treatment session)
Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4. On this scale, a score of 0 indicates "not satisfied"; 1 = mild satisfaction; 2 = moderate satisfaction; 3 = good satisfaction; and 4 = excellent satisfaction (which correlated with more than 75% perceived clinical improvement).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Participants with Treatment-Related Adverse Events through Week 27Baseline up to Week 27 (three months after the 6th treatment session).
Safety and tolerability were evaluated by documenting the total number of participants who developed side effects after injection into the treated keloid lesions. Monitoring was performed by the investigator at each injection session (weeks 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15) and monthly for 3 months post-treatment. Specific adverse events monitored included pain, swelling, infection, pigmentary changes, ulceration, and skin atrophy. A participant was counted if they experienced one or more of these events at any point during the evaluation period.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Recurrence From Week 15 up to Week 27From Week 15 up to Week 27 (three months after the 6th treatment session).
Keloid recurrence was evaluated through clinical examination to detect the reappearance of active keloid tissue growth. Lesions that achieved complete clinical healing or flattening at the end of the treatment sessions were monitored longitudinally. Recurrence is defined as an increase in volume, height, or vertical regrowth of the scar tissue.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 14

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25777304BACKGROUNDPubMed
26758090BACKGROUNDPubMed
26894654BACKGROUNDPubMed
29993130BACKGROUNDPubMed
30087573BACKGROUNDPubMed
30775139BACKGROUNDPubMed
31240510BACKGROUNDPubMed
31341409BACKGROUNDPubMed
32109921BACKGROUNDPubMed
34007848BACKGROUNDPubMed
34526861BACKGROUNDPubMed
36918908BACKGROUNDPubMed
37236718BACKGROUNDPubMed
39331598BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)