ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis Management in Children Using Diode Laser 980 Nanometer Versus Hyaluronic Acid Gel (RCT)

NCT07922681, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, National Research Centre, Egypt

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleRecurrent Aphthous Stomatitis Management in Children Using Diode Laser 980 Nanometer Versus Hyaluronic Acid Gel (RCT)ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07922681ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment30 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorNational Research Centre, EgyptClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsApthous UlcerClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionslaser therapy, Hyaluronic acid group, Negative control groupClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimarySeverity of preoperative pain related to the ulcer2 weeks
Assessment of the pain related to the ulcer where the unit of measurement is numbers from zero to ten. The measurement tool will be A visual analogue scale (VAS) consisting of a 10-cm horizontal line starting with a pole of no pain (zero) to reach the end pole presenting the unbearable pain (ten). Individuals will be requested to mark the point on the horizontal line that best signifies their pain level
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRate of ulcer size reduction2 weeks
The measurement tool will be the measurement of ulcer size by a calibrated periodontal probe, the two dimensions will be calculated to represent the cross-sectional areas of the lesion, The unit of measurement is millimeter where decreasing in ulcer size represent favorable healing
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRate of effectiveness indices (EI) of healing2 weeks
The measurement tool will be the effectiveness indices (EI) of the pain improvement and ulcer size will be analyzed with a formula EI = \[(V1 - V4 or V6) ÷ V1\] × 100 %\] where V4 and V6 refers to the values which will be measured at day 4 visit and day 6 visit, while V1 referred to the baseline value. The effectiveness indices will be evaluated on a 4-Rank scale: (Liu et al., 2006). * Rank (1): Heal: EI ≥ 95%. * Rank (2): Marked improvement: El \< 95%, but ≥ 70%. * Rank (3): Moderate improvement: EI \< 70%, but ≥ 30%. * Rank (4): No improvement: EI \< 30%. The unit of measurement is percentage, calculated from this formula then transformed into numerical ranks
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRate of postoperative complications2 weeks
The measurement tool will be survey questionnaire with ordinal scales will be filled by asking the children at each visit concerning their subjective experience of eating, drinking, and brushing teeth. The unit of measurement will be 4 response alternatives (no, slight, moderate, and severe difficulties)
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)