ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer

NCT07923110, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, University Ghent

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitlePost-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin SealerClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07923110ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment138 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversity GhentClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsPost Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache), Pulp Necrosis, Apical PeriodontitisClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsA calcium silicate-based sealer, An epoxy resin- based sealerClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-06ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryPost-operative pain6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 7 days after treatment
The post-operative pain is scored with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients are asked to fill out a pain diary 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and 7 days after treatment with a pain score on the Visual Analogue Scale. They mark the level of pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryTreatment outcomeup to 2 years following treatment
The 1 and 2 year success rates are determined using a combination of radiographic and clinical outcome measures. * Clinical: The absence of pain, tenderness, swelling and a sinus tract) * Radiographic: The pre-operative and recall periapical radiographs are assessed qualitatively by means of the Periapical Index (PAI) and quantitatively by means of surface area measurements of the APs on periapical radiographs. The two aforementioned outcomes will be combined to determine overall treatment success, which will be classified into three categories: * Strict success criteria (healed): Absence of clinical signs and/or radiographic evidence of complete resolution or the absence of a periapical radiolucency. * Loose success criteria (healing): Absence of clinical signs and a lower PAI-score/ smaller surface of the lesion compared to the pre-operative radiograph. * Failure (non-healing): Presence of clinical signs or unchanged/increased PAI-score (or surface of the lesion) at follow-up.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryQuality of obturationImmediately after treatment
The root canal obturation is evaluated on peri-apical radiograph on the presence of voids. First is stated if a void was present (Yes/No). If so, a distinction is made whether the void was smaller or bigger than 1 mm.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySealer extrusionImmediately after treatmentThe presence of sealer extrusion beyond the apical foramen is evaluated as a binary outcome (Yes/No).ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)