ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effectiveness of Low FODMAPs Diet Compared With Standard Dietary Advice in Functional Dyspepsia

NCT07925073, Not applicable, Recruiting, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffectiveness of Low FODMAPs Diet Compared With Standard Dietary Advice in Functional DyspepsiaClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07925073ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment100 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorKing Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsFunctional DyspepsiaClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsLow Fodmap dietary advice, Standard dietary adviceClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM) score2 weeks
The severity of functional dyspepsia symptoms will be assessed using the Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM), which consists of 20 items scored on a 6-point Likert scale from 0 (none) to 5 (very severe). The total score ranges from 0 to 5 when calculated as the mean of the item scores, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity and worse outcomes. The change in mean symptom score from baseline to the end of the 2-week intervention will be compared between the low-FODMAP and standard dietary advice groups. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 80
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in the Number of High-FODMAP Food Items Consumed2 weeks
Change in the number of high-FODMAP food items consumed, assessed by reviewing participants' food diaries and counting reported high-FODMAP food items at baseline and during the intervention. The change from baseline to the end of the 2-week intervention will be compared between the low-FODMAP and standard dietary advice groups.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Stool Consistency and Bowel Habits Assessed by Daily Bowel Diary2 weeks
Change in stool consistency measured using the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (separate hard lumps) to 7 (watery stool). Higher scores indicate looser stool consistency (worse outcome in terms of stool consistency). Bowel habits, including bowel movement frequency, will be assessed separately using the daily bowel diary.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L2 weeks
Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to Week 2, assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system assesses five dimensions of health, each with five response levels. The EQ-5D-5L index value will be calculated using the appropriate value set, with higher index values indicating better health-related quality of life.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)