ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

High-Intensity Interval Versus Aerobic Training for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Women With Heart Failure.

NCT07925515, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Universidad Internacional Isabel I de Castilla

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleHigh-Intensity Interval Versus Aerobic Training for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Women With Heart Failure.ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07925515ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment36 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversidad Internacional Isabel I de CastillaClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsHeart Failure Reduced Ejection FractionClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsHIIT + Strength Training, MICT + Strength TrainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryRecruitment RateFrom the start of recruitment to the end of the first 9 months of recruitment.
Number of participants randomised per month during the first nine months of recruitment. Feasibility will be classified as green if at least 2 participants per month are randomised, amber if 1 to less than 2 participants per month are randomised, and red if fewer than 1 participant per month is randomised.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryAcceptance of RandomisationFrom screening and referral throughout the recruitment period.Proportion of eligible women referred for cardiac rehabilitation who agree to randomisation. Green: at least 50%; amber: 30% to less than 50%; red: less than 30%.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryParticipant RetentionAt the end of the 12-week intervention.Proportion of randomised participants with a post-intervention assessment. Green: at least 85%; amber: 70% to less than 85%; red: less than 70%.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryAdherence to Prescribed Exercise SessionsThroughout the 12-week intervention.Proportion of prescribed exercise sessions attended by participants who complete the programme. Green: at least 80%; amber: 65% to less than 80%; red: less than 65%.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryFidelity to the Assigned HIIT InterventionThroughout the 12-week intervention.Proportion of HIIT sessions in which at least four intervals are completed above the second ventilatory threshold. Green: at least 75%; amber: 60% to less than 75%; red: less than 60%.ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryCompleteness of Post-Intervention MLHFQ DataAt the end of the 12-week intervention.
Proportion of randomised participants with a completed Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) at post-intervention assessment. Green: at least 90%; amber: 75% to less than 90%; red: less than 75%.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryExercise-Related Adverse EventsThroughout the 12-week intervention and the study period in which exercise-related adverse events are monitored.
Frequency and nature of adverse events related to exercise, including serious adverse events and events requiring modification of exercise prescription. Feasibility criteria are green if no serious exercise-related adverse event occurs; amber if non-serious events require modification of the prescription in more than 20% of cases; and red if any serious adverse event attributable to exercise occurs.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) Total ScoreBaseline and 12 weeks.
Between-group difference in the post-intervention MLHFQ total score, adjusted for baseline score using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The MLHFQ ranges from 0 to 105, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life. The baseline-to-post-intervention change will also be reported. This is an exploratory clinical outcome in the pilot trial and will not be used to establish confirmatory superiority.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2peak)Baseline and at 12 weeks
Between-group difference in peak oxygen uptake measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, adjusted for baseline VO2peak. VO2peak will be expressed in mL/kg/min and defined as the highest oxygen uptake achieved during the final 30 seconds of exercise.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)Baseline and at 12 weeksBetween-group difference in left ventricular ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, adjusted for baseline LVEF. Results will be expressed as percentage points.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChanges in NT-proBNP, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and CA125Baseline and at 12 weeks
Changes in circulating NT-proBNP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and CA125 concentrations from baseline to post-intervention. Between-group comparisons will be exploratory and adjusted for baseline values where appropriate.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)