ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Blood Flow Restriction-Low Intensity Resistance Training (BFR-LIRT) for Arm Paresis Post-stroke

NCT07925541, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleBlood Flow Restriction-Low Intensity Resistance Training (BFR-LIRT) for Arm Paresis Post-strokeClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07925541ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment32 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsHemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following StrokeClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsBlood flow restriction with low intensity resistance training, Sham Blood flow restriction with low intensity resistance trainingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in Upper Extremity Muscle StrengthBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Upper extremity muscle strength will be quantified as active peak joint torque of the paretic shoulder abductors, elbow extensors, wrist flexors, and wrist extensors during concentric contractions with upper extremity hemiparetic attachments. Changes in muscle strength will be compared between the BFR-LIRT and Sham+LIRT groups over the intervention period.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryReach-to-Grasp Movement TimeBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Reach-to-grasp performance of the paretic upper extremity will be recorded using a 3-dimensional motion-tracking system. Participants will reach from a standardized starting position and grasp a dowel placed at 90% of their individual maximum reaching distance. Total movement time will be calculated from movement onset to successful grasp of the object. Shorter movement time indicates improved reaching performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryReach Path CurvatureBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Reach path curvature will be measured during the same reach-to-grasp task using 3-dimensional motion tracking. Curvature will be calculated as the deviation of the wrist trajectory from a straight path between movement onset and object grasp. Lower values indicate a straighter and more direct reaching movement.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryUpper Extremity Motor ImpairmentBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Upper extremity motor impairment will be assessed using the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UEFM), a standardized clinical measure of motor impairment after stroke. Higher scores indicate less upper extremity motor impairment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherCorticospinal ExcitabilityBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Corticospinal excitability of the paretic extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) will be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A TMS recruitment curve will be generated by stimulating the ipsilesional motor cortex at increasing stimulation intensities. Corticospinal excitability will be quantified using the slope of the fitted recruitment curve. A steeper recruitment curve reflects greater corticospinal excitability.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherCorticoreticulospinal Pathway ExcitabilityBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Corticoreticulospinal pathway excitability will be assessed using TMS delivered over the motor cortex contralateral to the paretic arm while recording ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials from the paretic ECRL. Excitability will be quantified using the normalized area of the ipsilateral motor-evoked potential response. Greater response area indicates greater excitability of this pathway.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherSpinal Segmental ExcitabilityBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Spinal segmental excitability will be assessed using the H-reflex recorded from the paretic ECRL during peripheral stimulation of the radial nerve. The maximum H-reflex response will be normalized to the maximum motor response and expressed as the Hmax/Mmax ratio. This measure will be used to quantify changes in spinal pathway excitability.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherCross-Sectional Area of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Longus MuscleBaseline and after 3, 6, and 8 weeks of intervention commencement
Muscle size will be assessed using B-mode ultrasound to measure the cross-sectional area of the paretic extensor carpi radialis longus muscle. Three measurements will be obtained using standardized arm and probe positioning, and the average cross-sectional area will be used for analysis. Greater cross-sectional area indicates greater muscle size.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)