ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Effect of Multimodal Physical Therapy on Vaginismus Secondary to Chronic Constipation

NCT07926399, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, Cairo University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEffect of Multimodal Physical Therapy on Vaginismus Secondary to Chronic ConstipationClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07926399ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment40 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorCairo UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsVaginismus, Chronic ConstipationClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsConventional physiotherapy, Multimodal physical therapy programClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryAssessment of pain intensity2 weeks
Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain intensity. It is a popular tool for the measurement of pain; it will be used before and after treatment. It consists of a line usually 10 cm in length, it involves a 10 cm line where the left end indicates the absence of pain, and the right end indicates unbearable pain.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAssessment of sexual function2 weeks
The Female Sexual Function Index Scoring will be used to assess the female sexual function and diagnose female sexual dysfunction. Five factors or domains of sexual function were identified: (a) desire and subjective arousal, (b) lubrication, (c) orgasm, (d) satisfaction, and (e) pain/discomfort. It is a brief, multidimensional self-report instrument for assessing the key dimensions of sexual function in women. It is psychometrically sound, easy to administer, and has demonstrated ability to discriminate between clinical and nonclinical populations. The questionnaire described is designed and validated for assessment of female sexual function and quality of life in clinical trials or epidemiological studies
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAssessment of constipation2 weeks
Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom Questionnaire (KESS) will be used to assess constipation. It is a modified version of the Cleveland Clinic Score questionnaire. A structured interviewer led questionnaire consisting of eleven questions. This questionnaire was designed to be simple enough to be completed in under five minutes. Each question had four or five possible answers which were scored on an unweighted linear integer scale to produce a range of between zero and three or zero and four points. Lower scores represented symptom- free states and higher scores, increased symptom severity. The total (KESS) score was the sum of all scores gained on individual questions with a maximum possible of 39 points.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryMeasurement of pressure pain threshold at trigger points in hypertonic muscles2 weeks
The pressure pain threshold at trigger points in hypertonic muscles will be evaluated by a pressure algometer. It is a device that is accurately assess trigger points. Muscles should be relaxed, algometer's tip is placed on the most sensitive point in perineum and adductors muscle at a 90° angle, and pressure is gradually increased until the patient verbally expresses discomfort. This process can be repeated multiple times, and the average of the determined values is recorded.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryAssessment of cognitive and emotional responses related to vaginal penetration2 weeks
Vaginal Penetration Cognition Questionnaire (VPCQ) is a psychometric tool that will be used to assess cognitive and emotional responses specifically related to vaginal penetration. It is a brief self-report measure of cognitions regarding vaginal penetration in women diagnosed with lifelong vaginismus and acquired/lifelong dyspareunia. Statistical analyses resulted in a 22-item simultaneous solution forming the five VPCQ subscales, respectively, (i) "control cognitions," (ii) "catastrophic and pain cognitions," (iii) "self-image cognitions," (iv) "positive cognitions," and (v) "genital incompatibility cognitions. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all applicable / Never) to 6 (Very strongly applicable / Always).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDigital Rectal Examination Scoring System2 weeks
Digital rectal examinations (DREs) are a routine part of all general physical examinations and are particularly important in the evaluation of patients with disorders of defecation such as fecal incontinence and constipation. The Digital Rectal Examination Scoring System (DRESS) The system utilizes an analog scale of 0 to 5. During DRE, separate numbers are assigned to resting pressure (RP) and to maximal squeeze pressure (SQ). A score of 3 is normal. A resting score of 5 indicates very high pressures and a tight anal canal, whereas a score of 0 denotes an open or patulous anal canal at rest with separation of the buttocks. A squeeze score of 5 indicates a very strong squeeze, almost painful to the examiner, while a score of 0 denotes no discernable increase in pressure from rest with maximal patient effort.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)