ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Halova Vaginal Ovules Versus Placebo for Genitourinary Symptoms in Premenopausal Women

NCT07927088, Not applicable, Completed, Perfect Care Distribution

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleHalova Vaginal Ovules Versus Placebo for Genitourinary Symptoms in Premenopausal WomenClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07927088ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment150 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorPerfect Care DistributionClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsVaginal Dryness, Genitourinary SymptomsClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsHalova vaginal ovules, Placebo vaginal ovulesClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-09ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
At baseline, each participant identified the genitourinary symptom causing the greatest discomfort (Most Bothersome Symptom, MBS), including vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, or urinary symptoms. The same symptom was reassessed at Week 12 using an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 (symptom absent) to 10 (maximum severity). Improvement was calculated as the baseline score minus the Week 12 score, with positive values indicating reduced symptom severity.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index (VHI) Total Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Vaginal health was assessed using a study-adapted version of the Vaginal Health Index (VHI), as defined in the study-specific standardized clinical assessment guide. Five parameters were evaluated: vaginal elasticity, moisture, vaginal pH category, epithelial integrity, and inflammation. Each parameter was scored from 0 (severely impaired) to 5 (normal). The total score was calculated as the sum of the five component scores and ranged from 0 to 25, with higher scores indicating better vaginal health. Change was calculated as the Week 12 total score minus the baseline total score, with positive values indicating improvement.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index pH Component Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Vaginal pH was evaluated using the ordinal pH component of the Vaginal Health Index (VHI), based on predefined pH categories. Component scores ranged from 0 (pH greater than 6.5) to 5 (pH of 4.5 or lower), with higher scores indicating a more favorable vaginal pH category. The recorded outcome was the categorical component score rather than the exact numerical pH value. Change was calculated as the Week 12 component score minus the baseline score, with positive values indicating improvement.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) Total Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12
Female sexual function was assessed using the 19-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), covering six domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Total scores range from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating better sexual function. The outcome was calculated as the Week 12 total score minus the baseline score, with positive values indicating improvement. The primary FSFI analysis included participants with calculable total scores; analysis restricted to participants sexually active at baseline was supplementary.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) Score at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
The Most Bothersome Symptom identified at baseline was reassessed at Week 24 using the same 0-10 numerical rating scale. Improvement was calculated as the baseline score minus the Week 24 score, with positive values indicating reduced symptom severity. This assessment evaluated the persistence of symptom improvement after treatment discontinuation.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index Score at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
The Vaginal Health Index total score (0-25), calculated according to the study-specific standardized scoring guide, was reassessed at Week 24. Change was calculated as the Week 24 total score minus the baseline score, with positive values indicating improved vaginal health. This assessment evaluated the persistence of treatment effects.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index pH Component Score at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
The ordinal vaginal pH component score of the VHI (0-5) was reassessed at Week 24 using the same predefined categories. Change was calculated as the Week 24 component score minus the baseline score, with positive values indicating improvement in the vaginal pH category.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) Total Score at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
The Female Sexual Function Index total score (2-36) was reassessed at Week 24. Change was calculated as the Week 24 total score minus the baseline score, with positive values indicating improvement in sexual function. This assessment evaluated the persistence of treatment-related changes.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events During the StudyFrom baseline through Week 24
Safety was assessed by recording adverse events reported by participants or identified during scheduled clinical assessments and telephone follow-up. The outcome was the number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event during the study. Events were documented according to severity, suspected relationship to the assigned intervention, clinical management, and outcome.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryItem-Level Responses to a Menopause-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors QuestionnaireBaseline and Week 12
Participants completed a study-specific questionnaire at baseline, before individualized educational counseling and receipt of written educational materials, and again at Week 12. The questionnaire assessed recognition of menopause-related symptoms, associated health risks, and management options, as well as attitudes, information-seeking behaviors, and willingness to seek professional advice or accept local treatment. For each questionnaire item, outcomes were the number and percentage of participants selecting each response option at baseline and Week 12, and the change in these percentages between assessments. For questions allowing multiple responses, each response option was evaluated separately. No composite scoring algorithm was prespecified in the study protocol.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondarySelf-Reported Adherence to the Assigned Intervention at Weeks 4 and 8Weeks 4 and 8
Treatment adherence was assessed through structured telephone follow-up at Weeks 4 and 8. Participants reported whether they had used the assigned vaginal ovules according to the prescribed administration schedule (Yes/No). The outcome was the number and percentage of participants reporting adherence at each assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)