ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

External vs. Internal Focus During Abdominal Bracing in Low Back Pain

NCT07928518, Not applicable, Completed, Ivana Hanzlikova

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleExternal vs. Internal Focus During Abdominal Bracing in Low Back PainClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07928518ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment12 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorIvana HanzlikovaClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsChronic Non-Specific Low Back PainClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsIntervention 1 - External Focus, Intervention 2 - Internal FocusClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryRepeated Trunk Flexion (RTF) PerformanceBaseline and immediately after the 5-week intervention
Dynamic trunk movement performance was assessed using the Repeated Trunk Flexion (RTF) test. Participants performed 10 consecutive trunk flexion-extension movements from a standing position as quickly as possible, reaching their available range of motion and returning to an upright position. The test was performed twice, and the average completion time of the two trials was recorded in seconds. Lower values indicate better performance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryFlexor Endurance Test (FET)Baseline and immediately after the 5-week intervention.
Trunk flexor muscle endurance was assessed using the Flexor Endurance Test (FET). Participants maintained a 60-degree trunk flexion position for as long as possible until fatigue or loss of the required position. Endurance time was recorded in seconds. Higher values indicate better trunk muscle endurance.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryOswestry Disability Index (ODI)Baseline and immediately after the 5-week intervention.
Low back pain-related disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), version 2.1a. The questionnaire consists of 10 sections assessing limitations in daily activities. Scores are expressed as a percentage ranging from 0% (no disability) to 100% (maximum disability). Lower scores indicate less disability
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryNumerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline and immediately after the 5-week intervention.Pain intensity was assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryTampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)Baseline and immediately after the 5-week intervention.
Fear of movement and reinjury was assessed using the 17-item Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement or reinjury.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPressure Pain Threshold (PPT)Baseline and immediately after the 5-week intervention.
Mechanical pain sensitivity was assessed using a Wagner FPN 100 pressure algometer applied bilaterally over the lumbar erector spinae muscles, approximately 5 cm lateral to the L3 spinous process. Three measurements were obtained on each side and averaged. An overall pressure pain threshold was calculated as the mean of the left and right values. Higher values indicate lower mechanical pain sensitivity.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)