ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Single Versus Double Stapling and Two Purse-String Techniques in Rectal Cancer Surgery

NCT07929415, Not applicable, Recruiting, Alexandria University

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleSingle Versus Double Stapling and Two Purse-String Techniques in Rectal Cancer SurgeryClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07929415ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusRecruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment124 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorAlexandria UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsRectal CancerClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsDouble-Stapled Anastomosis, Single-Stapled Anastomosis With Intracorporeal Purse-String, Single-Stapled Anastomosis With Transanal Purse-StringClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryClinically Significant Anastomotic Leak Within 30 DaysWithin 30 days after surgery
Percentage of participants with an anastomotic leak classified as Grade B or Grade C according to the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer classification. Grade B requires active treatment without relaparotomy, and Grade C requires relaparotomy. The primary comparison will be between the combined single-stapling group and the double-stapling group.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPostoperative Complications According to the Clavien-Dindo ClassificationWithin 30 and 90 days after surgery
Percentage of participants experiencing postoperative complications, with severity classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. Complications will be assessed cumulatively at 30 and 90 days after surgery, and the highest complication grade experienced by each participant will be recorded at each assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryOperative TimeDuring the index operationDuration of the surgical procedure, measured in minutes.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryEstimated Intraoperative Blood LossDuring the index operationEstimated volume of blood lost during the surgical procedure, measured in milliliters.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryConversion From Minimally Invasive to Open SurgeryDuring the index operation
Percentage of participants whose planned minimally invasive procedure is converted to open surgery. The denominator will include participants in whom a minimally invasive approach was initially attempted.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPostoperative Length of Hospital StayFrom surgery to up to 10 weeksNumber of days from the index operation to discharge from the index hospital admission.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryBowel Function Assessed Using the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ScoreAt 6 and 12 months after surgery
Bowel function will be assessed using the five-item Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score. Total scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating worse bowel dysfunction. Scores of 0-20 indicate no LARS, 21-29 indicate minor LARS, and 30-42 indicate major LARS. Scores will be evaluated separately at each assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryFecal Incontinence Assessed Using the Wexner Incontinence ScoreAt 6 and 12 months after surgery
Fecal incontinence will be assessed using the Wexner (Cleveland Clinic) Incontinence Score. The five-item score evaluates incontinence to solid stool, liquid stool, and gas, pad use, and lifestyle alteration. Total scores range from 0 to 20, with 0 indicating no incontinence and higher scores indicating more severe incontinence. Scores will be evaluated separately at each assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryHealth-Related Quality of Life Assessed Using the EORTC QLQ-C30At 6 and 12 months after surgery
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Global health status/quality of life, functional scales, and symptom scales and items will be scored separately according to the scoring manual. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher global health and functional scores indicate better quality of life or functioning; higher symptom scores indicate worse symptoms. Scores will be evaluated separately at each assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)