ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

The Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Exercises on Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction During Intramuscular Injection

NCT07929883, Not applicable, Completed, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleThe Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Exercises on Pain, Comfort, and Satisfaction During Intramuscular InjectionClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07929883ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment140 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsProcedural PainClinicalTrials.gov
Interventions4 7 8 breath exerciseClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryPain Scores Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Immediately after intramuscular injection (post-injection) (Day 1)Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPost-Injection Satisfaction Scale ScoresImmediately after intramuscular injection (post-injection) (Day 1)
Post-Injection Satisfaction Scale The Post-Injection Satisfaction Scale (PISS), developed by Yıldız and ve Çiftçi, was used to assess patients' satisfaction with the injection procedure. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type structure rated from 1=Not at all satisfied to 5=Very satisfied. The scale consists of two dimensions: 'Satisfaction with the Practitioner' (Items 5-9) and 'Satisfaction with the Procedure' (Items 1-4). Scoring is based on the average of the items, with the lowest possible score being 1 and the highest possible score being 5. As the score increases, the patient's satisfaction level also increases.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryComfort Scale for InjectionImmediately after intramuscular injection (post-injection) (Day 1)
Comfort Scale for Injection (CTSI): The Comfort Scale for Injection was developed by Yıldız et al. 2024 to assess comfort levels related to injection procedures (Yildiz et al., 2024). It consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater comfort.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryInjection Fear Scale ScoresAssessment of the fear of injection experienced by the participants before the procedure.
Fear of Injection Scale (FIS): The Fear of Injection Scale was developed by Yıldız and Çiftçi (2023) to assess individuals' fear related to injection procedures (Yıldız \& Çiftçi, 2023). The scale consists of 14 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater fear.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)