ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Phase-Locked Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression

NCT07930000, Not applicable, Completed, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitlePhase-Locked Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant DepressionClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07930000ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment54 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorCheng-Hsin General HospitalClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsTreatment Resistant Depression (TRD)ClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsPhase-Locked Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation, Random-Phase Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst StimulationClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-10ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in HAM-D Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Depression severity was assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), with total scores ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Changes in total scores from baseline were evaluated at each post-baseline assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in MADRS Total ScoreBaseline (Day 1), Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Depression severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), with total scores ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. Changes in total scores from baseline were evaluated at each post-baseline assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryResponse Rate Based on HAM-DMid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Treatment response was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in HAM-D total score relative to baseline. The response rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryResponse Rate Based on MADRSMid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)
Treatment response was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in MADRS total score relative to baseline. The response rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRemission Rate Based on HAM-D17Mid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 total score of 7 or lower. The remission rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryRemission Rate Based on MADRSMid-treatment (Day 2), Post-treatment (Day 3), and Follow-up (Day 7)Remission was defined as a MADRS total score of 10 or lower. The remission rate was calculated as the percentage of participants meeting this criterion at each assessment time point.ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherChange From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Spectral PowerBefore and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded to assess changes in neural oscillatory activity following accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (aiTBS). Spectral power was quantified across conventional frequency bands, including delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma. Changes in spectral power from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherChange From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Phase-Amplitude CouplingBefore and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Resting-state EEG was analyzed to assess phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), reflecting the relationship between the phase of lower-frequency oscillations and the amplitude of higher-frequency activity. Changes in PAC strength from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages to characterize neurophysiological effects of aiTBS.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherResting-State EEG Functional ConnectivityBefore and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Resting-state EEG functional connectivity was assessed using phase-based synchronization measures between brain regions. Changes in functional connectivity from baseline were evaluated across treatment stages to investigate stimulation-related alterations in neural synchronization.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherChange From Baseline in Resting-State EEG Microstate ParametersBefore and after each of the 10 stimulation sessions over the 3-day treatment period (Days 1-3).
Resting-state EEG microstate analysis was used to characterize changes in the temporal dynamics of large-scale brain network activity. Microstate parameters included mean duration (ms), occurrence rate (events/s), time coverage (%), and transition probabilities between microstate classes. Changes in these parameters were evaluated across treatment sessions to investigate stimulation-related alterations in brain network dynamics.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)