ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Evaluation of Thenar Muscle Biomechanics and Thermal Sensory Thresholds in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

NCT07931092, Completed, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University

Trial 8

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleEvaluation of Thenar Muscle Biomechanics and Thermal Sensory Thresholds in Carpal Tunnel SyndromeClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07931092ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment43 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorKaramanoğlu Mehmetbey UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST), MyotonPROClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryMyotonometryduring the procedure
The viscoelastic and mechanical properties of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle, the primary superficial abductor of the thenar muscle group, were evaluated using a digital myotonometer (MyotonPRO, Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia). Participants were seated in a resting position with the forearm supported in full supination to ensure complete muscular relaxation. The probe was positioned perpendicular (90°) to the skin over the most prominent point of the APB muscle belly. Following standard mechanical preloading (0.18 N), the device delivered three consecutive mechanical impulses of 0.4 N with a duration of 15 ms at 0.8-second intervals.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryQuantitative sensory analysisduring the procedure
Quantitative sensory testing of small fibers (Aδ and C) was conducted using a Medoc TSA-2 Air analyzer (Medoc Advanced Medical Systems, Ramat Yishay, Israel) with a 30 × 30 mm Peltier thermode placed over the median nerve-innervated thenar eminence. From a baseline of 32 °C (safety limits: 0-50 °C) and a ramp rate of 1 °C/s, participants pressed a response button upon perceiving sensation to determine cold detection (CDT; Aδ fibers), warm detection (WDT; C fibers), cold pain (CPT), and heat pain (HPT) thresholds. Each parameter was recorded across three consecutive trials, and the mean values (°C) were used for analysis.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryHand grip/finger pinch strengthduring the procedure
Quantitative assessment of hand and finger motor performance strictly adhered to American Society of Hand Therapists guidelines. With participants seated upright (shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed, forearm supported in mid-rotation, and wrist slightly dorsiflexed), maximal handgrip strength was measured using a Baseline hydraulic hand dynamometer (90-kg capacity; Fabrication Enterprises, White Plains, NY, USA), and two-point pinch strength between the thumb and index finger was evaluated with a Baseline hydraulic pinch gauge. To prevent muscle fatigue and central effort loss, 60-second rest intervals were provided between consecutive trials, and the mean of three valid maximum isometric attempts was recorded as peak force in kilograms.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32323256RESULTPubMed
36334405RESULTPubMed
39526714RESULTPubMed
41014059RESULTPubMed

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.3.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2564a570df2e7274cee2d4fa2959402fab41880e2cd412e4b590390035fbea69391ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.3.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.