ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Electromyography-Guidance for Chemodenervation in Facial Synkinesis

NCT07931157, Phase 4, Completed, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleElectromyography-Guidance for Chemodenervation in Facial SynkinesisClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07931157ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPhase 4ClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment38 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsFacial SynkinesisClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsBotulinium Toxin-A, Electromyography-guided injection, Non-Electromyography-guided injectionClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) scorePre-injection and 3 weeks post-injection in each treatment period (crossover at 3 months)
The SAQ is a validated 9-item patient-reported measure of synkinesis-related symptoms, scored 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater synkinesis severity. Change from pre-injection to 3 weeks post-injection is compared between the electromyography (EMG)-guided and non-EMG-guided treatment periods.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) scorePre-injection and 3 weeks post-injection in each treatment period
The FaCE is a validated 15-item patient-reported instrument covering facial movement, facial comfort, oral function, eye comfort, lacrimal control, and social function. It is scored 0-100, and lower scores indicate greater disability. Change from pre-injection to 3 weeks post-injection is compared between treatment periods.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) composite scorePre-injection and 3 weeks post-injection in each treatment period
Standardized photographs were taken at rest and during forehead wrinkle, gentle eye closure, open-mouth smile, lip pucker, and snarl. They were graded by two independent physicians who were blinded to injection condition and to each other's scores, and who did not grade their own patients. The composite score ranges 0-100, and higher scores indicate better facial function. Change from pre-injection to 3 weeks post-injection is compared between treatment periods.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherProcedural Pain Score Measured Using a Non-Standardized 10-Point Numerical Rating ScaleImmediately after injection
Procedural pain was assessed immediately following each injection session using a non-standardized patient-reported numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicated greater pain during the injection procedure. Scores were compared between electromyography-guided and non-electromyography-guided treatment periods.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherProcedural Anxiety Score Measured Using a Non-Standardized 10-Point Numerical Rating ScaleImmediately after injection
Procedural anxiety was assessed immediately following each injection session using a non-standardized patient-reported numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicated greater anxiety experienced during the injection procedure. Scores were compared between electromyography-guided and non-electromyography-guided treatment periods.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherPatient Confidence in Provider Muscle Targeting Measured Using a Non-Standardized 10-Point Numerical Rating ScaleImmediately after injection in each treatment period
Patient confidence in the treating provider's ability to accurately target the intended facial muscle groups was assessed immediately following each injection session using a non-standardized patient-reported numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicated greater confidence in provider muscle-targeting accuracy. Scores were compared between electromyography-guided and non-electromyography-guided treatment periods.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherPerceived Importance of Electromyography Guidance Measured Using a Non-Standardized 10-Point Numerical Rating ScaleImmediately after injection
The perceived importance of electromyography guidance during botulinum toxin injections was assessed immediately following each injection session using a non-standardized patient-reported numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicated greater perceived importance of electromyography guidance. Scores were compared between electromyography-guided and non-electromyography-guided treatment periods.
ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherPatient Injection Technique Preference Assessed Using a Non-Standardized Post-Injection Preference SurveyImmediately after injection
Patient preference for electromyography-guided versus non-electromyography-guided botulinum toxin injections was assessed using a non-standardized patient-reported preference survey. Responses were categorized as preference for electromyography-guided injections, preference for non-electromyography-guided injections, or no preference. The proportion of participants selecting each response category was evaluated.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 16

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
10765054BACKGROUNDPubMed
11224766BACKGROUNDPubMed
18347234BACKGROUNDPubMed
20351606BACKGROUNDPubMed
23683725BACKGROUNDPubMed
25320703BACKGROUNDPubMed
26595022BACKGROUNDPubMed
27930763BACKGROUNDPubMed
28389084BACKGROUNDPubMed
30828959BACKGROUNDPubMed
31232802BACKGROUNDPubMed
32700008BACKGROUNDPubMed
33729598BACKGROUNDPubMed
34233854BACKGROUNDPubMed
36544062BACKGROUNDPubMed
37253169BACKGROUNDPubMed

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.3.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2564a570df2e7274cee2d4fa2959402fab41880e2cd412e4b590390035fbea69391ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.3.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.