ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Interactive Patient Education App for Informed Consent Before Cataract Surgery

NCT07931976, Not applicable, Completed, Johannes Kepler University of Linz

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleInteractive Patient Education App for Informed Consent Before Cataract SurgeryClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07931976ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment90 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorJohannes Kepler University of LinzClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsCataract, Informed ConsentClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsPAULA interactive patient education app, General control videoClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryObjective Knowledge About Cataract Surgeryimmediately after the preoperative informed consent discussion
Score on a 20-item single-choice questionnaire assessing knowledge about cataract, cataract surgery, risks and postoperative course. Score range 0-20 (number of correct answers); higher scores indicate better knowledge.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDuration of the Physician's Informed Consent Discussionimmediately after the preoperative informed consent discussionDuration of the face-to-face informed consent discussion between physician and participant, measured in minutes.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDecisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Total Scoreimmediately after the preoperative informed consent discussionTotal score of the Decisional Conflict Scale (16 items). Score range 0-100; higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict.ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryVision-Related Quality of Life (Catquest-9SF, German Version)immediately after the preoperative informed consent discussion
Patient-reported visual function measured with the German version of the 9-item Catquest-9SF questionnaire, analyzed as Rasch-calibrated person score; lower scores indicate fewer difficulties with vision in daily life.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryUsability of the PAULA App (System Usability Scale)immediately after the preoperative informed consent discussionSystem Usability Scale (SUS), 10 items, assessed in the intervention group only. Score range 0-100; higher scores indicate better usability.ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherWorkflow Efficiency as Rated by Clinical Staffimmediately after the preoperative informed consent discussionIndividual assessments of clinical staff regarding the efficiency of the preoperative consent workflow.ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherAcceptance of the App and Difficulties Using the Tabletimmediately after the preoperative informed consent discussionAcceptance of the app and difficulties in handling the tablet, documented in written notes by clinical assistant staff.ClinicalTrials.gov
OtherQualitative Participant Feedbackimmediately after the preoperative informed consent discussionOral qualitative feedback from participants on the informed consent process.ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)