ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

Stress Coping Training for Nurses and Diabetes Control

NCT07933159, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, The New Model of Care, Hail Health Cluster

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleStress Coping Training for Nurses and Diabetes ControlClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07933159ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusNot yet recruitingClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment204 participants, estimatedClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorThe New Model of Care, Hail Health ClusterClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsPsychological Stress, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM), Occupational Stress or Workplace StressClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsPsychological Stress Management and Coping Mechanisms for Nurses: Enhancing Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryBaseline Demographic and Professional Characteristics of Participating NursesBaseline, pre-intervention [Day 0, first face-to-face interview]
Demographic and professional characteristics collected using a researcher-designed form, including: gender, age group, marital status, educational level in nursing, years of nursing experience, job position, and nationality.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryPerceived stressPretest, immediate post-test, and follow-up three months
Nurses' stress will be measure with the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS- 14; Cohen et al., 1983). Items are rated from 0 (never) to 4 (very often) with reference to the past month. The seven positively worded items (perceived self-efficacy/control) will be reverse score, and all items will be sum to give a total score from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater stress. Subscale scores were computed for helplessness (seven negatively worded items, 0-28) and perceived self-efficacy/control (seven positively worded items, raw scoring, 0-28; higher scores indicating greater perceived control).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryCoping strategiesPretest, immediate post-test, and follow-up three months
Coping will be measure with the 29-item revised Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL; Vitaliano et al., 1985), which comprises five subscales: problem-focused coping (12 items), seeking social support (3 items), self-blame (3 items), wishful thinking (6 items), and avoidance (5 items). Items are rated from 1 (not at all) to 4 (to a great extent).
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryDiabetes self-management self-efficacyPretest, immediate post-test, and follow-up three months
Patients will be complete the 20-item Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES; van der Bijl et al., 1999), which covers blood glucose monitoring (3 items), dietary control (10 items), physical activity (3 items), foot care (1 item), and medication intake and follow-up (3 items). Items are rated from 0 (cannot do at all) to 10 (certainly can do); total scores range from 0 to 200, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy, and were classified as low (\<120), moderate (120-149), or high (≥150).
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)