A Case Study to Assess a Brightening Skincare Regimen in Patients With Bothersome Skin Dark Spots
NCT07933380, Not applicable, Completed, Revision Skincare
Trial 10
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Title | A Case Study to Assess a Brightening Skincare Regimen in Patients With Bothersome Skin Dark Spots | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| NCT number | NCT07933380 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Status | Completed | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Phases | Not applicable | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Enrollment | 7 participants, actual | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Lead sponsor | Revision Skincare | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Conditions | Post - Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation, Pigmentation | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Interventions | Cleanser, Moisturizer, and Sunscreen | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| First posted | 2026-11-12 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Last updated | 2026-11-12 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Registered outcomes 3
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Improvement of Clinical Efficacy Parameters at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks versus Baseline | Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 compared to baseline | A board-certified dermatologist will grade skin tone evenness, overall appearance, and PIH at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Skin tone evenness and overall appearance will be graded using the modified Griffiths 10-point scale (0 = Even healthy skin color; 9 = Uneven, discolored appearance), while PIH will be measured using a 4-point investigator global assessment scale (0 = clear, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Higher scores indicate greater severity of the respective skin condition, where a decrease in score indicates an improvement. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Primary | Measurement of subject self assessment questionnaire | Baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 | Subjects will complete a self-assessment questionnaire which will consist of a series of questions related to subjects' evaluation of product efficacy and attributes. Subjects are asked to rate based on a scoring system of the following: from 5 (completely agree) to 1 (completely disagree). The best outcome is to Completely Agree with the statement / question being asked. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Secondary | Lack of Significant Increase in Objective Tolerability Parameters at weeks, 2, 4, 8, 12 compared to Baseline | Baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 | Clinical grading of Objective Irritation Parameters (Erythema, Edema, and Dryness) evaluated by investigator and subject reporting of Subjective Irritation Parameters (Burning, Stinging, Itching) using a 4 point scale: 0 = None to 3 = Severe. A change in scores or lack of significant change at week 2, 4, 8 and 12 compared to Baseline indicates tolerability/safety of the test material. A lower score indicating a better outcome. | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Outcomes 0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as | Source |
|---|
Results by group 0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units | Source |
|---|
Participant flow 0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted | Source |
|---|
Adverse events 0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events | Source |
|---|
Adverse event totals 0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk | Source |
|---|
Papers 0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as | Source |
|---|
Grants 0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
| Project | Title | Principal investigators | Organization | Funder | Fiscal years | Source |
|---|
Trial comparisons 0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|
Tests 0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
| Test | Named as | Source |
|---|
Source 5
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Release | trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Release manifest SHA-256 | 0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Registry capture | 2026-11-12 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| Results copy, AACT | 2026-03-23 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
| NIH clinical studies file | 2026-11-13 | ClinicalTrials.gov |
Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)