ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

The Effect of Motivational Interviewing Applied to Men During the Infertility Treatment Process on the Perception of Spouse Support and Infertility Stress in Women

NCT07934277, Not applicable, Completed, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Trial 10

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleThe Effect of Motivational Interviewing Applied to Men During the Infertility Treatment Process on the Perception of Spouse Support and Infertility Stress in WomenClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT07934277ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment108 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorIstanbul University - CerrahpasaClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsInfertility, Infertility (IVF Patients)ClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsMotivational InterviewingClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in Total Score on The COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales Among WomenBaseline and immediately post-intervention
Infertility-related stress among women was assessed using the COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales developed by Schmidt (2006) and validated in Turkish by Yilmaz and Yesiltepe Oskay (2016). The scale consists of 14 items across three subscales: personal stress (0-20 points), marital stress (0-14 points), and social stress (0-12 points). Total scores range from 0 to 46, with higher scores indicating greater infertility-related stress. Changes in total scores from baseline to post-intervention were compared between the intervention and control groups. Change in total score was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in Spousal Support Scale Total Score Among WomenBaseline and immediately post-intervention
Perceived spousal support among women was assessed using the Spousal Support Scale developed by Yildirim (2004). The scale consists of 27 items rated on a three-point Likert scale and includes four subscales: emotional support (9 items), instrumental and informational support (7 items), appreciation support (8 items), and social interest support (3 items). Items 10, 20, and 24 are reverse-scored. Total scores range from 27 to 81, with higher scores indicating greater perceived spousal support. Changes in total scores from baseline to post-intervention were compared between the intervention and control groups. Change in total score was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Total Score on The COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales Among MenBaseline and immediately post-intervention
Infertility-related stress among men was assessed using the COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales developed by Schmidt (2006) and validated in Turkish by Yilmaz and Yesiltepe Oskay (2016). The scale consists of 14 items across three subscales: personal stress (0-20 points), marital stress (0-14 points), and social stress (0-12 points). Total scores range from 0 to 46, with higher scores indicating greater infertility-related stress. Changes in total scores from baseline to post-intervention were compared between the intervention and control groups. Change in total score was calculated as the post-intervention score minus the baseline score.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource

Results by group 0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource

Participant flow 0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource

Papers 0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource

Tests 0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)