Comparison · NCT00004732-sae
Carotid-Artery Stenting vs Carotid Endarterectomy: serious adverse events
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Carotid-Artery Stenting vs Carotid Endarterectomy: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00004732-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00004732-sae
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.255 | 0.232 | 0.28 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.235 | 0.213 | 0.26 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0197 | -0.0141 | 0.0533 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.08 | 0.944 | 1.24 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.11 | 0.927 | 1.33 | log | |
| Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Carotid-Artery Stenting than on Carotid Endarterectomy | 50.8 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Carotid-Artery Stenting | Patients Randomized to CAS | 322 | 1,262 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Carotid Endarterectomy | Patients Randomized to CEA | 292 | 1,240 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, serious adverse events
- Time frame
- Periprocedural period
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial
- NCT number
- NCT00004732
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Atherosclerosis, Stroke, Carotid Stenosis, Cerebral Infarction, Myocardial Infarction
- Interventions
- Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA), Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)
- Lead sponsor
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
- Results first posted
- 2013-12-10
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00004732?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00004732-sae