ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00355368-3e39e2ce

Succinylcholine vs Rocuronium: Number of Participants With an Failed First Intubation Attempts

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Succinylcholine vs Rocuronium: Number of Participants With an Failed First Intubation Attempts. Trial comparisons, record NCT00355368-3e39e2ce. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00355368-3e39e2ce

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.160.1160.217wilson
Risk in group 20.180.1330.239wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.02-0.09390.054newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8890.5761.37log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8680.5151.46log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Succinylcholine than on Rocuronium50from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Succinylcholine32200OG000
Group 2Rocuronium36200OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With an Failed First Intubation Attempts
Description
defined as either uncompleted intubation attempt within 90 sec or starting a second intubation attempt
Time frame
within the first 90 sec following the start of induction
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Succinylcholine Versus Rocuronium for Emergency Intubation in Intensive Care
NCT number
NCT00355368
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Intubation
Interventions
Succinylcholine, Rocuronium
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Results first posted
2011-12-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00355368-3e39e2ce