ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00364351-c6031d69

Vandetanib vs Erlotinib: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Vandetanib vs Erlotinib: Objective Response Rate (ORR). Trial comparisons, record NCT00364351-c6031d69. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00364351-c6031d69

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.120.09710.148wilson
Risk in group 20.120.09660.148wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00045-0.0360.0368newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 210.7431.36log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 210.7131.41log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Vandetanib than on Erlotinib2,220from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1VandetanibVandetanib 300 mg75623OG000
Group 2ErlotinibErlotinib74617OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Description
The ORR is the number of patients that are responders ie those patients with a confirmed best objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined according to RECIST 1.0. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions with no evidence of tumour elsewhere and PR is defined as at least a 30% reduction in the total tumour size of measurable lesions with no new lesions and no progression in the non-target lesions.
Time frame
RECIST tumour assessments every 4 weeks up to week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter from randomisation until the date of first documented objective disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 21 months
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy Trial Comparing ZD6474 With Erlotinib in NSCLC After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT00364351
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
Vandetanib, Erlotinib
Lead sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Results first posted
2011-05-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00364351-c6031d69