ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00364351

Efficacy Trial Comparing ZD6474 With Erlotinib in NSCLC After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy

NCT00364351, Phase 3, Completed, Genzyme, a Sanofi Company; results first posted 2011-05-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy Trial Comparing ZD6474 With Erlotinib in NSCLC After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy. Trials, record NCT00364351. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00364351

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy Trial Comparing ZD6474 With Erlotinib in NSCLC After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT00364351
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,574 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Conditions
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
Vandetanib, Erlotinib
First posted
2006-08-15
Last updated
2018-01-25
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2006-000259-16
Results first posted
2011-05-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)
progressionRECIST tumour assessments carried out every 4 weeks up to week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter from randomisation until the date of first documented objective disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed.
Median time (in weeks) from randomisation until objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of objective progression) provided death is within 3 months from the last evaluable Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) assessment. Progression was derived according to RECIST 1.0 and is defined as an increase of at least 20% in the total tumour size of measurable lesions over the nadir measurement, unequivocal progression in the non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Time to death in months
Overall survival is defined as the time from date of randomization until death. Any patient not known to have died at the time of analysis will be censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive (ie their status must be known at the censored date and should not be lost to follow up or unknown).
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)
RECIST tumour assessments every 4 weeks up to week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter from randomisation until the date of first documented objective disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 21 months
The ORR is the number of patients that are responders ie those patients with a confirmed best objective response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined according to RECIST 1.0. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions with no evidence of tumour elsewhere and PR is defined as at least a 30% reduction in the total tumour size of measurable lesions with no new lesions and no progression in the non-target lesions.
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR)RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 4 weeks until week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter (+/- 3 days) from randomisation until objective progression
Disease control rate is defined as the number of patients who achieved disease control at least 8 weeks following randomisation. Disease control is defined as a best objective response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) \>= 8 weeks as determined according to RECIST 1.0. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions with no evidence of tumour elsewhere, PR is defined as at least a 30% reduction in the total tumour size of measurable lesions with no new lesions and no progression in the non-target lesions and SD \>= 8 is assigned to patients who have not responded and have no evidence of progression at least 8 weeks after randomisation.
SecondaryTime to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Pain
Disease-related symptom assessments are to be administered at screening (within 7 days before the first dose of study medication), every 4 weeks thereafter, at discontinuation of study treatment and at the 30-day follow-up visit
Pain was assessed as the average score of two items: Question 9 ("Have you had pain") and 19 ("Did pain interfere with your daily activities") of the QLQ-C30. Time to deterioration in symptoms is defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the first assessment of worsened without an improvement in the next 28 days. A patient is defined as having a deterioration in symptoms if they have a single visit assessment of 'worsened' with no visit assessment of 'improved' within the next 28 days.
SecondaryTime to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Dyspnoea
Disease-related symptom assessments are to be administered at screening (within 7 days before the first dose of study medication), every 4 weeks thereafter, at discontinuation of study treatment and at the 30-day follow-up visit
Dyspnea was assessed as the average score of four items: Question 8 of the QLQ-C30 ("Were you short of breath") and Question 3 of the QLQ-C30 ("Were you short of breath when you rested"), Questions 4 ("Were you short of breath when you walked") and 5 ("Were you short of breath when you climbed stairs") of the QLQ-LC13 (or, equivalently, Questions 33, 34 and 35 of the combined QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires). Time to deterioration in symptoms is defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the first assessment of worsened without an improvement in the next 28 days. A patient is defined as having a deterioration in symptoms if they have a single visit assessment of 'worsened' with no visit assessment of 'improved' within the next 28 days.
SecondaryTime to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Cough
Disease-related symptom assessments are to be administered at screening (within 7 days before the first dose of study medication), every 4 weeks thereafter, at discontinuation of study treatment and at the 30-day follow-up visit
Cough was assessed using Question 1 ("How much did you cough") of the QLQ-LC13 (or, equivalently, Question 31 of the combined QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires). Time to deterioration in symptoms is defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the first assessment of worsened without an improvement in the next 28 days. A patient is defined as having a deterioration in symptoms if they have a single visit assessment of 'worsened' with no visit assessment of 'improved' within the next 28 days.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS)
progressionRECIST tumour assessments carried out every 4 weeks up to week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter from randomisation until the date of first documented objective disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed.
WeeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Time to death in monthsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR)
RECIST tumour assessments every 4 weeks up to week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter from randomisation until the date of first documented objective disease progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 21 months
ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease Control Rate (DCR)RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 4 weeks until week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter (+/- 3 days) from randomisation until objective progressionParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Pain
Disease-related symptom assessments are to be administered at screening (within 7 days before the first dose of study medication), every 4 weeks thereafter, at discontinuation of study treatment and at the 30-day follow-up visit
WeeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Dyspnoea
Disease-related symptom assessments are to be administered at screening (within 7 days before the first dose of study medication), every 4 weeks thereafter, at discontinuation of study treatment and at the 30-day follow-up visit
WeeksMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Cough
Disease-related symptom assessments are to be administered at screening (within 7 days before the first dose of study medication), every 4 weeks thereafter, at discontinuation of study treatment and at the 30-day follow-up visit
WeeksMEDIAN

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Vandetanib11.3Full Range 0.14 to 75.43Weeks
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Erlotinib8.9Full Range 0.43 to 80.43Weeks
Overall Survival (OS)Vandetanib6.9Full Range 0.03 to 18.46Months
Overall Survival (OS)Erlotinib7.8Full Range 0.10 to 20.04Months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Vandetanib75Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Erlotinib74Participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Vandetanib254Participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Erlotinib242Participants
Time to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - PainVandetanib11.1Inter-Quartile Range 4.4 to 26Weeks
Time to Deterioration of Disease-related Symptoms (TDS) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - PainErlotinib9.9Inter-Quartile Range 4.3 to 24.3Weeks

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVandetanib623
Overall StudySTARTEDErlotinib617
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVandetanib31
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDErlotinib34
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVandetanib592
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDErlotinib583

Adverse events502

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersVandetanib58623
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib87614
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersVandetanib300623
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib232614
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersVandetanib29623
otherDyspepsiaGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib31614
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersVandetanib138623
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib131614
otherStomatitisGastrointestinal disordersVandetanib33623
otherStomatitisGastrointestinal disordersErlotinib33614

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVandetanib
Total, all-cause mortalityErlotinib
Total, other adverse eventsVandetanib539623
Total, other adverse eventsErlotinib542614
Total, serious adverse eventsVandetanib197623
Total, serious adverse eventsErlotinib155614

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21282542RESULTPubMed
25881079DERIVEDPubMed
40785488DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Vandetanib vs Erlotinib: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Trial comparisons
Vandetanib vs Erlotinib: Disease Control Rate (DCR)Trial comparisons
Vandetanib vs Erlotinib: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00364351

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00364351/events?page=2