ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00364351-d9f6328e

Vandetanib vs Erlotinib: Disease Control Rate (DCR)

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Vandetanib vs Erlotinib: Disease Control Rate (DCR). Trial comparisons, record NCT00364351-d9f6328e. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00364351-d9f6328e

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4080.370.447wilson
Risk in group 20.3920.3540.431wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0155-0.0390.0698newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.040.9071.19log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.070.851.34log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Vandetanib than on Erlotinib64.6from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1VandetanibVandetanib 300 mg254623OG000
Group 2ErlotinibErlotinib242617OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Description
Disease control rate is defined as the number of patients who achieved disease control at least 8 weeks following randomisation. Disease control is defined as a best objective response of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) \>= 8 weeks as determined according to RECIST 1.0. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions with no evidence of tumour elsewhere, PR is defined as at least a 30% reduction in the total tumour size of measurable lesions with no new lesions and no progression in the non-target lesions and SD \>= 8 is assigned to patients who have not responded and have no evidence of progression at least 8 weeks after randomisation.
Time frame
RECIST tumour assessments carried out every 4 weeks until week 16 then every 8 weeks thereafter (+/- 3 days) from randomisation until objective progression
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy Trial Comparing ZD6474 With Erlotinib in NSCLC After Failure of at Least One Prior Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT00364351
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
Vandetanib, Erlotinib
Lead sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Results first posted
2011-05-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00364351-d9f6328e