ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00377234-sae

Ibandronate vs Risedronate: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ibandronate vs Risedronate: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00377234-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00377234-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01530.006550.0353wilson
Risk in group 20.009170.003120.0266wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00612-0.01340.027newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.670.4026.92log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.680.3977.08log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Ibandronate than on Risedronate164from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1IbandronateIbandronate adverse events5327EG000
Group 2RisedronateRisendronate adverse events3327EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Study duration was approximately 6 months (3 months and 12 weeks) and a follow-up period of 15 days after the completion of treatment was included to assess safety information. Participants were assessed for adverse events for a total of 6.5 months.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study Comparing Monthly Boniva (Ibandronate) and Weekly Risedronate in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis.
NCT number
NCT00377234
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Post Menopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Risedronate, ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results first posted
2015-07-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00377234-sae