ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00377234

A Study Comparing Monthly Boniva (Ibandronate) and Weekly Risedronate in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis.

NCT00377234, Phase 4, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2015-07-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study Comparing Monthly Boniva (Ibandronate) and Weekly Risedronate in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis. Trials, record NCT00377234. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00377234

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study Comparing Monthly Boniva (Ibandronate) and Weekly Risedronate in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis.
NCT number
NCT00377234
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
356 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Post Menopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Risedronate, ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]
First posted
2006-09-18
Last updated
2016-08-01
Results first posted
2015-07-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosingat 6 months
Patients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronatewithin 6 months
Patients who had taken at least one dose of each study medication were asked to answer a Preference Questionnaire (answered by patients before any study procedures took place at the 6 month visit or at the early termination visit). The questionnaire included three questions on the preferred dosing schedule, and one question asking which schedule was more convenient. No assistance was allowed in completing the questionnaire.
SecondaryIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptomswithin 3 months
Patients were given a diary in which to record their upper GI events during the first 12 weeks of treatment. The diary was to be completed weekly and the occurrence of symptoms and their intensity recorded using a pre-defined list.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)3 months
During the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.
SecondaryMedian Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)3 months
During the conduct of this study, it came to the attention of the sponsor that mislabeling of blood samples for the analysis of the bone turnover markers, serum CTX and BSAP, had occurred at more than half of the 44 clinical trial sites. As a result of this mislabeling, the bone turnover marker samples could not be assigned correctly to the two time points at which they were collected (samples collected at baseline and those collected at the crossover visit which occurred after 3 months following the start of trial treatment). Thus, the results of bone turnover markers could not be reliably assessed. Therefore, summary tables showing the mean and median change from baseline for both serum CTX and BSAP for patients randomized to Sequence A (3 months of ibandronate followed by 12 weeks of risedronate) or Sequence B (12 weeks of risedronate followed by 3 months of ibandronate) are not presented, as a valid interpretation of the data cannot be made.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly Dosingat 6 monthsModified Intent to Treat (mITT), defined as the safety analysis set excluding those participants who did not express a preference for one treatmentpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly Risedronatewithin 6 monthsmITT, defined as the safety analysis set excluding those participants who did not express a preference for one treatmentpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYIntensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptomswithin 3 monthsSafety analysis setpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)3 months
Mislabeling of blood samples for analysis of bone turnover markers resulted in inability to correctly assign samples to two time points at which they were collected (baseline and crossover visit). Results could not be reliably assessed or reported.
SECONDARYMedian Change From Baseline in Bone Resorption and Bone Formation Markers, Serum C-telopeptide of α-chain of Type I Collagen (CTX) and Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)3 months
Mislabeling of blood samples for analysis of bone turnover markers resulted in inability to correctly assign samples to two time points at which they were collected (baseline and crossover visit). Results could not be reliably assessed or reported.

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly DosingDuring Sequence A81.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly DosingDuring Sequence B78.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Preferred Ibandronate Monthly Dosing to Risedronate Weekly DosingTotal79.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly RisedronateDuring Sequence A85.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly RisedronateDuring Sequence B87.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Found Once-monthly Ibandronate to be More Convenient Than Once-weekly RisedronateTotal86.3percentage of participants
Intensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsIbandronateAny46.1percentage of participants
Intensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsRisedronateAny56.5percentage of participants
Intensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsIbandronateMild41.3percentage of participants
Intensity of Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) SymptomsRisedronateMild49.1percentage of participants

Participant flow20

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSequence A180
Overall StudySTARTEDSequence B176
Overall StudyRandomizedSequence A180
Overall StudyRandomizedSequence B176
Overall StudyDid Not Receive Study TreatmentSequence A3
Overall StudyDid Not Receive Study TreatmentSequence B2
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentSequence A177
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentSequence B174
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set: Period 1Sequence A177
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set: Period 1Sequence B174

Adverse events20

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousCoronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disordersIbandronate13271
seriousCoronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disordersRisedronate03270
seriousPericarditisCardiac disordersIbandronate13271
seriousPericarditisCardiac disordersRisedronate03270
seriousVitreous HaemorrhageEye disordersIbandronate03270
seriousVitreous HaemorrhageEye disordersRisedronate13271
seriousAbdominal HerniaGastrointestinal disordersIbandronate13271
seriousAbdominal HerniaGastrointestinal disordersRisedronate03270
seriousSmall Intestinal ObstructionGastrointestinal disordersIbandronate13271
seriousSmall Intestinal ObstructionGastrointestinal disordersRisedronate03270

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityIbandronate
Total, all-cause mortalityRisedronate
Total, other adverse eventsIbandronate0327
Total, other adverse eventsRisedronate0327
Total, serious adverse eventsIbandronate5327
Total, serious adverse eventsRisedronate3327

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Ibandronate vs Risedronate: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00377234

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00377234/registered