ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00410072-sae

ETV 0.5 mg vs ETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ETV 0.5 mg vs ETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00410072-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00410072-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.07140.04220.118wilson
Risk in group 20.07110.04280.116wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.000363-0.0530.0551newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.4862.08log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.4592.2log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on ETV 0.5 mg than on ETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg2,760from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1ETV 0.5 mgETV 0.5 mg monotherapy given QD for 100 weeks13182EG000
Group 2ETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mgETV 0.5 mg plus TDF 300 mg combination therapy given once daily (QD) for 100 weeks14197EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Week 0 to Week 100 (on study), Post-dosing follow-up - 24 Weeks

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Entecavir Plus Tenofovir Combination Therapy Versus Entecavir Monotherapy in Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B
NCT number
NCT00410072
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Hepatitis B, Chronic
Interventions
Entecavir, Entecavir + Tenofovir
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Results first posted
2012-02-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00410072-sae