ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00410072

Entecavir Plus Tenofovir Combination Therapy Versus Entecavir Monotherapy in Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B

NCT00410072, Phase 3, Completed, Bristol-Myers Squibb; results first posted 2012-02-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Entecavir Plus Tenofovir Combination Therapy Versus Entecavir Monotherapy in Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B. Trials, record NCT00410072. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00410072

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Entecavir Plus Tenofovir Combination Therapy Versus Entecavir Monotherapy in Naive Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B
NCT number
NCT00410072
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
669 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Conditions
Hepatitis B, Chronic
Interventions
Entecavir, Entecavir + Tenofovir
First posted
2006-12-12
Last updated
2013-03-15
Results first posted
2012-02-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) Levels <50 IU/mL by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Week 96At Week 96
HBV DNA levels \<50 IU/mL=approximately 300 copies/mL. Analyses of binary efficacy endpoint during on-treatment period focused on participants who received treatment and used the analysis of noncompleter=failure (NC=F). All participants who received treatment were included in the denominator, and participants with missing measurements were counted as nonresponders for the specific endpoints.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusAt Weeks 48 and 96
HBV DNA levels \<50 IU/mL=approximately 300 copies/mL. Analyses of binary efficacy endpoint during on-treatment period focused on participants who received treatment and used the analysis of noncompleter=failure (NC=F). All participants who received treatment were included in the denominator, and participants with missing measurements were counted as nonresponders for the specific endpoints.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <LOQ by PCR at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96
LOQ=lower limit of quantitation. LOQ=29 IU/mL, or approximately 169 copies/mL. LOQ is the level above which quantitative results may be obtained with a specified degree of confidence. The LOQ is mathematically defined as equal to 10 times the standard deviation of the results for a series of replicates used to determine a justifiable limit of detection. Limits of quantitation are matrix-, method-, and analyte-specific.Analyses of binary efficacy endpoint during on-treatment period focused on participants who received treatment and used the analysis of noncompleter=failure (NC=F). All participants who received treatment were included in the denominator, and participants with missing measurements were counted as nonresponders for the specific endpoints.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <LOD by PCR at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96
LOD=Lower limit of detection. LOD) LOD=10 IU/mL, or approximately 58 copies/mL. LOD is the lowest concentration level that can be determined to be statistically different from a blank (99% confidence). The LOD is typically determined to be in the region where the signal to noise ratio is greater than 5. Limits of detection are matrix-, method-, and analyte-specific.Analyses of binary efficacy endpoint during on-treatment period focused on participants who received treatment and used the analysis of noncompleter=failure (NC=F). All participants who received treatment were included in the denominator, and participants with missing measurements were counted as nonresponders for the specific endpoints.
SecondaryMean Log 10 HBV DNA at Weeks 48 and 96Baseline, Weeks 48 and 96HBV DNA was analyzed by PCR, using the Roche COBAS®TaqMan - HPS assay. Reduction in Log 10 HBV count=reduced viral load.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96
ALT normalization= ≤1\*upper limit of normal (ULN). Analyses of binary efficacy endpoint during on-treatment period focused on participants who received treatment and used the analysis of noncompleter=failure (NC=F). All participants who received treatment were included in the denominator, and participants with missing measurements were counted as nonresponders for the specific endpoints.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96
HBeAg is a hepatitis B viral protein and is an indicator of active viral replication. Analyses of binary efficacy endpoint during on-treatment period focused on participants who received treatment and used the analysis of noncompleter=failure (NC=F). All participants who received treatment were included in the denominator, and participants with missing measurements were counted as nonresponders for the specific endpoints.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion [( at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96HBeAg seroconversion=HBeAg loss and presence of hepatitis B e antibody (HBeAb). HBeAg is a hepatitis B viral protein and is an indicator of active viral replication.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96
HBsAg = A part of the hepatitis B virus. When found in the blood, HBsAg is an early marker of infection. Analyses of binary efficacy endpoint during on-treatment period focused on participants who received treatment and used the analysis of noncompleter=failure (NC=F). All participants who received treatment were included in the denominator, and participants with missing measurements were counted as nonresponders for the specific endpoints.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96HBsAg = a part of the hepatitis B virus that, when in the blood, is an early marker of infection.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) Levels <50 IU/mL by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Week 96At Week 96Evaluable participants. A participant missing the efficacy assessments for a visit is considered a failure and is counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusAt Weeks 48 and 96Evaluable participants. If a participant is missing the efficacy assessments for a visit, this is considered a failure and is counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <LOQ by PCR at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96Evaluable participants. A participant missing the efficacy assessments for a visit is considered a failure and is counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <LOD by PCR at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96Evaluable participants. A participant missing the efficacy assessments for a visit is considered a failure and is counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Log 10 HBV DNA at Weeks 48 and 96Baseline, Weeks 48 and 96Evaluable participants at given time point. If a participant is missing the efficacy assessments for a visit, this is considered a failure and is counted as evaluable.log10 copies/mLMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96Evaluable participants. A participant missing the efficacy assessments for a visit is considered a failure and counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Loss at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96Treated HBeAg-positive participants. If a participant was missing the efficacy assessments for a visit, this is considered a failure and was counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With HBeAg Seroconversion [( at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96Treated HBeAg-positive participants. A participant missing the efficacy assessments for a visit was considered a failure and was counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96Treated HBeAg-positive participants. If a participant was missing the efficacy assessments for a visit, this is considered a failure and was counted as evaluable.Percent of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 48 and 96At Weeks 48 and 96Treated HBeAg-positive participants. If a participant was missing the efficacy assessments for a visit, this is considered a failure and was counted as evaluable.Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group102

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) Levels <50 IU/mL by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Week 96ETV 0.5 mg76.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) Levels <50 IU/mL by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) at Week 96ETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg83.2Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mgHBeAg+ at Week 48 (n=126, n=138)61.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mgHBeAg+ at Week 48 (n=126, n=138)74.6Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mgHBeAg- at Week 48 (n=56, n=59)91.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mgHBeAg- at Week 48 (n=56, n=59)93.2Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mgHBeAg+ at Week 96 (n=126, n=138)69.8Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mgHBeAg+ at Week 96 (n=126, n=138)80.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mgHBeAg- at Week 96 (n=56, n=59)91.1Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HBV DNA Levels <50 IU/mL by PCR at Week 48 and Week 96 by Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) StatusETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mgHBeAg- at Week 96 (n=56, n=59)89.8Percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Day 1 to Week 48STARTEDETV 0.5 mg182
Day 1 to Week 48STARTEDETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg197
Day 1 to Week 48COMPLETEDETV 0.5 mg176
Day 1 to Week 48COMPLETEDETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg185
Day 1 to Week 48NOT COMPLETEDETV 0.5 mg6
Day 1 to Week 48NOT COMPLETEDETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg12
After Week 48 to Week 96STARTEDETV 0.5 mg176
After Week 48 to Week 96STARTEDETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg185
After Week 48 to Week 96COMPLETEDETV 0.5 mg170
After Week 48 to Week 96COMPLETEDETV 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg174

Adverse events76

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherBACK PAINMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersETV 0.5 mg13182
otherBACK PAINMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg9197
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersETV 0.5 mg11182
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg13197
otherCOUGHRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersETV 0.5 mg7182
otherCOUGHRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg13197
otherFATIGUEGeneral disordersETV 0.5 mg11182
otherFATIGUEGeneral disordersETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg12197
otherABDOMINAL PAIN UPPERGastrointestinal disordersETV 0.5 mg13182
otherABDOMINAL PAIN UPPERGastrointestinal disordersETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg8197

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityETV 0.5 mg
Total, all-cause mortalityETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg
Total, other adverse eventsETV 0.5 mg69182
Total, other adverse eventsETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg73197
Total, serious adverse eventsETV 0.5 mg13182
Total, serious adverse eventsETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg14197

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
22643350DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
ETV 0.5 mg vs ETV/TDF 0.5 mg +TDF 300 mg: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00410072

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00410072/results?page=2