ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00534638-771d4f2b

Cervarix/Engerix-B Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Group: Number of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Infection With HPV-16/18 Types

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cervarix/Engerix-B Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Group: Number of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Infection With HPV-16/18 Types. Trial comparisons, record NCT00534638-771d4f2b. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00534638-771d4f2b

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.002820.001480.00535wilson
Risk in group 20.01610.01110.0233wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0133-0.0206-0.00765newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.1750.08270.372log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.1730.08120.369log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Cervarix/Engerix-B Pooled Group than on Engerix-B Group75.448.5131from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Cervarix/Engerix-B Pooled Group
Pooled A and B group: This pooled group includes subjects from communities where 70% of male and female adolescents (A group) or 70% of female adolescents (B group) were to be vaccinated with Cervarix vaccine. To achieve a Cervarix vaccination coverage of 70%, a 9:1 ratio was used to allocate study participants (A group) or female participants (B group) to receive Cervarix vaccine versus control Engerix-B vaccine (meaning 90% of vaccinated subjects (A group) or vaccinated females (B group) were randomized to Cervarix). Finally, subjects from this pooled group were either vaccinated with Cervarix, Engerix-B (control vaccine), or not vaccinated (enrolled control without vaccination). Vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6-month schedule.
93,192OG000
Group 2Engerix-B Group
In this control group, all adolescents were to be vaccinated with Engerix-B control vaccine. Finally, subjects from this group were either vaccinated with Engerix-B or not vaccinated. The vaccine was administered intramuscularly in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6-month schedule.
271,679OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Infection With HPV-16/18 Types
Description
The analysis of total effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against oropharyngeal infection with HPV-16/18 types was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
Time frame
At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
Population
The analysis was performed on female study participants from the Total Enrolled cohort on effectiveness, which included all study participants who were previously enrolled in the immunization phase, and those who joined the trial at Visit 5, for whom results were available.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Effectiveness, Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents
NCT number
NCT00534638
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Infections, Papillomavirus
Interventions
Cervarix, Engerix-B
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Results first posted
2016-01-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00534638-771d4f2b