ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00534638

Effectiveness, Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents

NCT00534638, Phase 4, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2016-01-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effectiveness, Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents. Trials, record NCT00534638. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00534638

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effectiveness, Safety and Immunogenicity of GSK Biologicals' HPV Vaccine GSK580299 (Cervarix) Administered in Healthy Adolescents
NCT number
NCT00534638
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
34,412 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Infections, Papillomavirus
Interventions
Cervarix, Engerix-B
First posted
2007-09-26
Last updated
2019-11-15
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2007-001731-55
Results first posted
2016-01-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group Versus Engerix-B Group and in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Engerix-B Group
At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of overall effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against genital infection with HPV-16/18 types was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The overall vaccine effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
SecondaryNumber of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With HPV-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Cervarix/Engerix-B B GroupAt the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of overall effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against genital infection with HPV-16/18 types was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The overall vaccine effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all subjects from the Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group). Note: As per Protocol and as the confirmatory objectives were not met, only exploratory interpretation could be performed for what concerns this secondary outcome measure.
SecondaryNumber of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesAt the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of overall effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against genital infection with specific HPV types (16, 18, 31/45, 31/33/45, 31/33/45/51, 31/33/45/51/52, 31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 6, 11, 6/11, 6/11/53/74) was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
SecondaryNumber of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Infection With HPV-16/18 TypesAt the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of total effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against oropharyngeal infection with HPV-16/18 types was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
SecondaryNumber of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesAt the time of Visit 5 (at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis of total effectiveness of Cervarix vaccine against oropharyngeal infection with specific HPV types (16, 18, 31/45, 31/33/45, 31/33/45/51, 31/33/45/51/52, 31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, 6, 11, 6/11, 6/11/53/74) was based on stratified Mantel-Haenszel adjusted for clustering. The effectiveness was computed as 1- the prevalence odd ratio in all Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group (prevalence rate in all Cervarix vaccinated subjects from the investigated group/prevalence rate in all subjects from Engerix-B Group).
SecondaryNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms, in a Subset of SubjectsDuring the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness and swelling. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm) of injection site.
SecondaryNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Any, Grade 3 and Related to Vaccination Solicited General Symptoms, in a Subset of SubjectsDuring the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever \[defined as axillary temperature equal to or above 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)\], gastrointestinal symptoms (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain), headache, myalgia, rash and urticaria. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 symptom = symptom that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = fever \> 39.0 °C. Related = symptom assessed by the investigator as related to the vaccination.
SecondaryNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Any, Grade 3 and Related to Vaccination Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), in a Subset of SubjectsWithin the 30-day post-vaccination period
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. Grade 3 AE = an AE which prevented normal, everyday activities. Related = AE assessed by the investigator as related to the vaccination.
SecondaryNumber of Male Subjects With Urticaria/Rash Within 30 Minutes After Each Vaccination Dose, in a Subset of SubjectsWithin 30 minutes following each vaccination dose
The number of subjects with urticaria/rash assessed within 30 minutes following each vaccine dose are reported. Confirmed urticaria/rash = subjects who reported urticaria/rash within the specified time frame. Not confirmed urticaria/rash = number of subjects who did not report urticaria/rash within the specified time frame.
SecondaryNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Medically Significant Conditions (MSCs), in a Subset of SubjectsFrom Dose 1 (at Day 0) until Month 12
MSCs are defined as AEs prompting emergency room or physician visits that are not (1) related to common diseases or (2) routine visits for physical examination or vaccination, or SAEs that are not related to common diseases. Common diseases include: upper respiratory infections, sinusitis, pharyngitis, gastroenteritis, urinary tract infections and injury.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group Versus Engerix-B Group and in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Engerix-B Group
At the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis was performed on female study participants from the Total Enrolled cohort on effectiveness, which included all study participants who were previously enrolled in the immunization phase, and those who joined the trial at Visit 5, for whom results were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With HPV-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Cervarix/Engerix-B B GroupAt the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis was performed on female study participants from the Total Enrolled cohort on effectiveness, which included all study participants who were previously enrolled in the immunization phase, and those who joined the trial at Visit 5, for whom results were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesAt the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis was performed on female study participants from the Total Enrolled cohort on effectiveness, which included all study participants who were previously enrolled in the immunization phase, and those who joined the trial at Visit 5, for whom results were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Infection With HPV-16/18 TypesAt the time of Visit 5 (i.e. at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis was performed on female study participants from the Total Enrolled cohort on effectiveness, which included all study participants who were previously enrolled in the immunization phase, and those who joined the trial at Visit 5, for whom results were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesAt the time of Visit 5 (at 18.5 years of age)
The analysis was performed on female study participants from the Total Enrolled cohort on effectiveness, which included all study participants who were previously enrolled in the immunization phase, and those who joined the trial at Visit 5, for whom results were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Any and Grade 3 Solicited Local Symptoms, in a Subset of SubjectsDuring the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
The analysis was performed on the Total vaccinated cohort (TVC) - the Diary card subset, which included a subset of male adolescents from Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group and Engerix-B Group, with at least one study vaccine administration documented, who were selected for active assessment of safety using diary cards and for whom data were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Any, Grade 3 and Related to Vaccination Solicited General Symptoms, in a Subset of SubjectsDuring the 7-day post-vaccination period following each dose and across doses
The analysis was performed on the TVC - the Diary card subset, which included a subset of male adolescents from Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group and Engerix-B Group, with at least one study vaccine administration documented, who were selected for active assessment of safety using diary cards and for whom data were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Any, Grade 3 and Related to Vaccination Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), in a Subset of SubjectsWithin the 30-day post-vaccination period
This analysis was performed on the TVC - the Diary Card subset, which included a subset of male adolescents from Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group and Engerix-B Group who were selected for active assessment of safety using diary cards and for whom data were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Male Subjects With Urticaria/Rash Within 30 Minutes After Each Vaccination Dose, in a Subset of SubjectsWithin 30 minutes following each vaccination dose
This analysis was performed on the TVC - the Diary Card subset, which included a subset of male adolescents from Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group and Engerix-B Group who were selected for active assessment of safety using diary cards and for whom data were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Male Subjects Reporting Medically Significant Conditions (MSCs), in a Subset of SubjectsFrom Dose 1 (at Day 0) until Month 12
This analysis was performed on the TVC - the Diary Card subset, which included a subset of male adolescents from Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group and Engerix-B Group who were selected for active assessment of safety using diary cards and for whom data were available.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group373

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group Versus Engerix-B Group and in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Engerix-B Group
Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group139Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group Versus Engerix-B Group and in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Engerix-B Group
Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group117Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group Versus Engerix-B Group and in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Engerix-B Group
Engerix-B Group329Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With HPV-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Cervarix/Engerix-B B GroupCervarix/Engerix-B A Group139Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With HPV-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Cervarix/Engerix-B B GroupCervarix/Engerix-B B Group117Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesCervarix/Engerix-B A GroupHPV-1688Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesCervarix/Engerix-B B GroupHPV-1685Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesEngerix-B GroupHPV-16227Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesCervarix/Engerix-B A GroupHPV-1862Participants
Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Oncogenic Infection With Specific HPV TypesCervarix/Engerix-B B GroupHPV-1841Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCervarix Pooled Group14,837
Overall StudySTARTEDEngerix-B Pooled Group17,338
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCervarix Pooled Group8,346
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEngerix-B Pooled Group5,547
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCervarix Pooled Group6,491
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEngerix-B Pooled Group11,791

Adverse events226

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPainGeneral disordersCervarix Pooled Group506603
otherPainGeneral disordersEngerix-B Pooled Group2511,028
otherRednessGeneral disordersCervarix Pooled Group169603
otherRednessGeneral disordersEngerix-B Pooled Group1311,028
otherArthralgiaGeneral disordersCervarix Pooled Group107604
otherArthralgiaGeneral disordersEngerix-B Pooled Group971,028
otherFatigueGeneral disordersCervarix Pooled Group291604
otherFatigueGeneral disordersEngerix-B Pooled Group4111,028
otherFever (Axillary)General disordersCervarix Pooled Group48604
otherFever (Axillary)General disordersEngerix-B Pooled Group851,028

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCervarix Pooled Group014,837
Total, all-cause mortalityEngerix-B Pooled Group017,338
Total, other adverse eventsCervarix Pooled Group506643
Total, other adverse eventsEngerix-B Pooled Group4111,047
Total, serious adverse eventsCervarix Pooled Group18814,837
Total, serious adverse eventsEngerix-B Pooled Group15217,338

Papers12

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25593103DERIVEDPubMed
27841725BACKGROUNDPubMed
29055031DERIVEDPubMed
29845626DERIVEDPubMed
31736068DERIVEDPubMed
31829767DERIVEDPubMed
32161969DERIVEDPubMed
32574384DERIVEDPubMed
33639181DERIVEDPubMed
34097688DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 12

See all 12 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons7

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Cervarix Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Pooled Group: Number of Male Subjects Reporting Medically Significant Conditions (MSCs), in a Subset of SubjectsTrial comparisons
Cervarix Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Pooled Group: Number of Subjects With New Onset of Autoimmune Diseases (NOADs), Retrieved From Care Register for Social Welfare and Health Care (HILMO)Trial comparisons
Cervarix/Engerix-B Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Group: Number of Female Subjects With Total Vaccine Effectiveness Against Oropharyngeal Infection With HPV-16/18 TypesTrial comparisons
Cervarix Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Pooled Group: Number of Subjects Reporting SAEs Assessed by the Investigator as Possibly Related to VaccinationTrial comparisons
Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group vs Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group: Number of Female Subjects With Overall Vaccine Effectiveness Against Genital Infection With HPV-16/18 Types in Cervarix/Engerix-B A Group Versus Cervarix/Engerix-B B Group
Trial comparisons
Cervarix Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Pooled Group: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Cervarix Pooled Group vs Engerix-B Pooled Group: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00534638

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00534638/results?page=2