ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00545363-sae

BMF Participants vs No BMF Participants: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. BMF Participants vs No BMF Participants: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00545363-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00545363-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02260.01150.044wilson
Risk in group 20.0140.0060.0324wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00859-0.01290.0314newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.610.5334.88log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.630.5275.02log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on BMF Participants than on No BMF Participants116from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1BMF Participants
Postmenopausal women received ibandronate 150 mg QM orally for 6 months. Participants, in this arm, received BMF at Month 3. BMF was given in terms of providing serum CTX level at Month 3. A BMF-form was provided to the physicians to allow offering the bone marker result in an easy way. Participants were informed that their results were within or outside of the desired range. In addition, participants were also supported by PRP, carried out by supplying alarm devices, specifically designed to support the participant's regular drug intake.
8354EG000
Group 2No BMF Participants
Postmenopausal women received ibandronate 150 mg QM orally for 6 months. Participants were supported by PRP, carried out by supplying alarm devices, specifically designed to support the participant's regular drug intake.
5357EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
15-30 days after final visit (final visit=up to 6 months)

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Adherence to Once Monthly Ibandronate (Bonviva) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis, Supported by a Patient Relationship Program (PRP)
NCT number
NCT00545363
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Ibandronate
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results first posted
2016-10-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00545363-sae