ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00545363

A Study of Adherence to Once Monthly Ibandronate (Bonviva) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis, Supported by a Patient Relationship Program (PRP)

NCT00545363, Phase 4, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2016-10-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Adherence to Once Monthly Ibandronate (Bonviva) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis, Supported by a Patient Relationship Program (PRP). Trials, record NCT00545363. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00545363

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Adherence to Once Monthly Ibandronate (Bonviva) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis, Supported by a Patient Relationship Program (PRP)
NCT number
NCT00545363
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
716 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
Ibandronate
First posted
2007-10-17
Last updated
2016-10-24
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2005-005529-74
Results first posted
2016-10-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Adherence to TreatmentUp to 6 months
Participants were considered adherent to treatment if they took at least 83 percent (%) of their assigned medications (5 of the 6 monthly ibandronate tablets) within the -1 to +21 days of their osteoporosis treatment date each month. Participant adherence was assessed by maintaining records of 'drug dispensed' and 'drug returned' on case report form (CRF) and participant's self-report on Visit 2 (Month 3) and final study visit (Month 6). A drug dispensing log was maintained by the investigator. Participants were instructed at the baseline visit and Visit 2 to save and return unused or partially used medication packages on Visit 2 and final study visit, respectively.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Composite Satisfaction High ScoresAt Month 6
The OPSAT-Q is a validated questionnaire designed to capture satisfaction with bisphosphonate treatment. It comprises four domains: convenience (questions 1 - 6), quality of life (questions 7 and 8), overall satisfaction (questions 9 and 10), and side effects (questions 11 - 16). Satisfaction with treatment was assessed using the OPSAT-Q composite satisfaction score, which was the average of the scores from the four domains of the OPSAT-Q converted to a 0 - 100-point scale. Higher scores indicated greater treatment satisfaction. A score of 80 or more was considered as high score.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Perception Survey (OPPS) and Osteoporosis Medical Care Satisfaction Questionnaire (OMSQ) Composite Satisfaction High ScoreAt Month 6
OPPS: A standardized 6-item satisfaction questionnaire for osteoporosis medical care and treatment received during the study. Individual item score was transformed and converted to a 0 to 100 scale where higher score indicated greater satisfaction. The composite score was the average of individual item scores (transformed) and ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated greater satisfaction. OMSQ: A standardized 18-item satisfaction questionnaire for osteoporosis medical care, treatment received and blood test and their results during the study. Individual item score was transformed and converted to a 0 to 100 scale where higher score indicated greater satisfaction. The composite score was the average of individual item scores (transformed) and ranged from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated greater satisfaction.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in CTX Based on Adherence to IbandronateBaseline, Month 6
Serum CTX, a biochemical marker of bone resorption, was assessed for all participants at baseline and at final visit (Month 6). The sampling was done at the same time of the day each time to overcome the effect of circadian fluctuations. Participants were considered adherent to treatment if they took at least 83% of their assigned medications (5 of the 6 monthly ibandronate tablets) within the -1 to +21 days of their osteoporosis treatment date each month. Participant adherence was assessed by maintaining records of 'drug dispensed' and 'drug returned' on CRF and participant's self-report on Visit 2 (Month 3) and final study visit (Month 6). A drug dispensing log was maintained by the investigator. Participants were instructed at the baseline visit and Visit 2 to save and return unused or partially used medication packages on Visit 2 and final study visit, respectively.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Adherence to TreatmentUp to 6 monthsIntent to treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. Number of participants analyzed=number of participants evaluable for this outcome.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Composite Satisfaction High ScoresAt Month 6ITT population. Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Perception Survey (OPPS) and Osteoporosis Medical Care Satisfaction Questionnaire (OMSQ) Composite Satisfaction High ScoreAt Month 6ITT population. Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in CTX Based on Adherence to IbandronateBaseline, Month 6ITT population. Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for this outcome and n represents number of participants analyzed for the specified category.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Adherence to TreatmentBMF Participants98.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Adherence to TreatmentNo BMF Participants98.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Composite Satisfaction High ScoresBMF Participants87.72percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) Composite Satisfaction High ScoresNo BMF Participants87.62percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Perception Survey (OPPS) and Osteoporosis Medical Care Satisfaction Questionnaire (OMSQ) Composite Satisfaction High ScoreBMF Participants74.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Osteoporosis Patient Perception Survey (OPPS) and Osteoporosis Medical Care Satisfaction Questionnaire (OMSQ) Composite Satisfaction High ScoreNo BMF Participants72.2percentage of participants
Percent Change From Baseline in CTX Based on Adherence to IbandronateBMF ParticipantsAdherence-Yes (n=279, 281)-47.595% Confidence Interval -51.3 to -43.5percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in CTX Based on Adherence to IbandronateNo BMF ParticipantsAdherence-Yes (n=279, 281)-47.595% Confidence Interval -51.0 to -43.9percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in CTX Based on Adherence to IbandronateBMF ParticipantsAdherence-No (n=1, 6)-71.7495% Confidence Interval NA to NApercent change
Percent Change From Baseline in CTX Based on Adherence to IbandronateNo BMF ParticipantsAdherence-No (n=1, 6)-25.895% Confidence Interval -91.0 to 13.5percent change

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBone Marker Feedback (BMF) Participants358
Overall StudySTARTEDNo BMF Participants358
Overall StudyTreatedBone Marker Feedback (BMF) Participants354
Overall StudyTreatedNo BMF Participants357
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBone Marker Feedback (BMF) Participants339
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNo BMF Participants343
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBone Marker Feedback (BMF) Participants19
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNo BMF Participants15

Adverse events338

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBMF Participants0354
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNo BMF Participants2357
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBMF Participants1354
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNo BMF Participants0357
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersBMF Participants1354
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersNo BMF Participants0357
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersBMF Participants3354
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersNo BMF Participants0357
otherTricuspid valve diseaseCardiac disordersBMF Participants1354
otherTricuspid valve diseaseCardiac disordersNo BMF Participants0357

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBMF Participants
Total, all-cause mortalityNo BMF Participants
Total, other adverse eventsBMF Participants196354
Total, other adverse eventsNo BMF Participants224357
Total, serious adverse eventsBMF Participants8354
Total, serious adverse eventsNo BMF Participants5357

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
BMF Participants vs No BMF Participants: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00545363

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00545363/events?page=2