ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00672841-sae

Active Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy vs Standard Care, Empiric Treatment: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Active Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy vs Standard Care, Empiric Treatment: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00672841-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00672841-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.0756wilson
Risk in group 2000.184wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.1840.0756newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyActive surveillance group. Preemptive therapy initiated in response to a positive 1,3-beta-D glucan test for the presumptive early treatment of invasive candidiasis047EG001
Group 2Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentStandard care group. Empiric antifungal therapy initiated by physician preference for the treatment of suspected invasive candidiasis.017EG000

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
β-D-Glucan (BDG) Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin vs. Standard Care for Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Patients
NCT number
NCT00672841
Phases
NA
Conditions
Invasive Candidiasis
Interventions
Preemptive Therapy with Anidulafungin, Empiric antifungal therapy based on physician discretion.
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Results first posted
2013-04-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00672841-sae