ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00672841

β-D-Glucan (BDG) Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin vs. Standard Care for Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Patients

NCT00672841, Not applicable, Completed, Duke University; results first posted 2013-04-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. β-D-Glucan (BDG) Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin vs. Standard Care for Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Patients. Trials, record NCT00672841. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00672841

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
β-D-Glucan (BDG) Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin vs. Standard Care for Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Patients
NCT number
NCT00672841
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
64 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Conditions
Invasive Candidiasis
Interventions
Preemptive Therapy with Anidulafungin, Empiric antifungal therapy based on physician discretion.
First posted
2008-05-06
Last updated
2015-02-06
Results first posted
2013-04-22
Limitations and caveats
This study represents a 1st attempt at preemptive antifungal therapy based on the fungal biomarker 1,3-Beta-D-Glucan in the intensive care unit. Main limitation: the small number of subjects with proven/probable invasive candidiasis.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 days
Clinical utility was defined as β-D-glucan test performance. Biweekly βDG testing used a threshold of ≥ 60 pg/ml to indicate a positive test for invasive candidiasis. True and false positives, and true and false negatives were confirmed using a composite clinical definition of invasive candidiasis that combines physical symptom/signs and microbiology. Cases of proven/probable invasive fungal infection (IFI) were adjudicated by a single reviewer blinded to group assignment and BDG results.
PrimarySafety and Tolerability of Preemptive Anidulafunginweekly until ICU dischargereported as the Number of Adverse Events Possibly Related to Study Drug
SecondaryValidate Gene Expression Signatures Predictive of ICStudy Completion, an average of 17 days
SecondaryIncidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 days
Institution specific criteria were used to establish a diagnosis of proven or probable invasive candidiasis. Other IFIs were classified according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycosis Study Group (EORTC/MSG) criteria. However, BDG results were not factored into the EORTC/MSG criteria.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYClinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 daysTwo study subjects in the preemptive therapy arm were excluded from the analysis of assay sensitivity and specific due to icteric serum specimens.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYValidate Gene Expression Signatures Predictive of ICStudy Completion, an average of 17 daysData was not collected for this outcome measure.
SECONDARYIncidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)Participants were followed until ICU discharge, an average of 17 days4 subjects in the preemptive therapy were excluded from this analysis. These subjects were treated with empiric antifungal therapy despite repeatedly negative glucan results.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYSafety and Tolerability of Preemptive Anidulafunginweekly until ICU dischargeSubjects receiving at least 1 dose of anidulafungin were assessed.eventsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyTrue BDG Positives3participants
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentTrue BDG Positives3participants
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyTrue BDG Negative19participants
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentTrue BDG Negative9participants
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyFalse BDG Positives23participants
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentFalse BDG Positives5participants
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Active Surveillance, Preemptive TherapyFalse BGD Negatives0participants
Clinical Utility of Biweekly β-D-glucan (BDG) Testing in At-risk Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients.Standard Care, Empiric TreatmentFalse BGD Negatives0participants
Incidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)Standard Care, Empiric Treatment3participants
Incidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)Active Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy3participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDStandard Care, Empiric Treatment17
Overall StudySTARTEDActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy47
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStandard Care, Empiric Treatment16
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy32
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStandard Care, Empiric Treatment1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy15

Adverse events6

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersStandard Care, Empiric Treatment050
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy2212
otherAbnormal liver function testsHepatobiliary disordersStandard Care, Empiric Treatment050
otherAbnormal liver function testsHepatobiliary disordersActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy9219
otherHypocalcemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersStandard Care, Empiric Treatment050
otherHypocalcemiaMetabolism and nutrition disordersActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy2212

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityStandard Care, Empiric Treatment
Total, all-cause mortalityActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy
Total, other adverse eventsStandard Care, Empiric Treatment017
Total, other adverse eventsActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy1047
Total, serious adverse eventsStandard Care, Empiric Treatment017
Total, serious adverse eventsActive Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy047

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
22879929DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Active Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy vs Standard Care, Empiric Treatment: Incidence of Proven or Probable Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)Trial comparisons
Active Surveillance, Preemptive Therapy vs Standard Care, Empiric Treatment: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00672841

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00672841/registered