ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00800384-e0744846

ICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing vs ICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing: First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic Death

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing vs ICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing: First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic Death. Trial comparisons, record NCT00800384-e0744846. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00800384-e0744846

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.07220.05910.0879wilson
Risk in group 20.0830.0690.0996wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0108-0.0320.0102newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.870.6631.14log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8590.6411.15log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on ICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing than on ICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing92.4from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1ICD Implant Without Defibrillation TestingPatients in this arm were implanted with their ICD without having the defibrillation test performed at implant. No VF induction was performed.901,247OG000
Group 2ICD Implant With Defibrillation TestingPatients in this arm were implanted with their ICD and VF induction was performed followed by shock delivery to test shock efficacy at implant.1041,253OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic Death
Description
The number of patients having experienced either an appropriate inefficient shock and/or arrhythmic death during the follow-up time frame of 3.1 years is compared between both groups.
Time frame
Mean follow-up of 3.1 years
Population
All patients were analyzed as per intention to treat. An on treatment analysis was performed in 1190 patients in the group without defibrillation testing and in 1165 patients in the group with defibrillation testing.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Shockless Implant Evaluation
NCT number
NCT00800384
Phases
NA
Conditions
Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular Tachycardia
Interventions
Implantable defibrillator
Lead sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Results first posted
2015-12-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00800384-e0744846