ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00800384

Shockless Implant Evaluation

NCT00800384, Not applicable, Completed, Boston Scientific Corporation; results first posted 2015-12-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Shockless Implant Evaluation. Trials, record NCT00800384. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00800384

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Shockless Implant Evaluation
NCT number
NCT00800384
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
2,500 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Conditions
Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular Tachycardia
Interventions
Implantable defibrillator
First posted
2008-12-02
Last updated
2018-03-30
Results first posted
2015-12-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryFirst Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic DeathMean follow-up of 3.1 yearsThe number of patients having experienced either an appropriate inefficient shock and/or arrhythmic death during the follow-up time frame of 3.1 years is compared between both groups.
SecondaryPerioperative Complication Rate30 daysA predefined set of expected complications attributed to defibrillation testing during implant procedure was analyzed in both groups.

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYFirst Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic DeathMean follow-up of 3.1 years
All patients were analyzed as per intention to treat. An on treatment analysis was performed in 1190 patients in the group without defibrillation testing and in 1165 patients in the group with defibrillation testing.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPerioperative Complication Rate30 daysPerioperative complication rate was assessed in patients undergoing ICD implant. Number of patients having experienced at least one of the predefined complications was assessed.participantsNUMBER

Results by group4

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic DeathICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing90participants
First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic DeathICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing104participants
Perioperative Complication RateICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing69participants
Perioperative Complication RateICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing81participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing1,247
Overall StudySTARTEDICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing1,253
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing1,206
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing1,210
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing41
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing43

Adverse events668

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPG SystemCardiac disordersICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing11,2471
otherPG SystemCardiac disordersICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing01,2530
otherOversensing - RACardiac disordersICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing11,2471
otherOversensing - RACardiac disordersICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing01,2530
otherOther - PG systemCardiac disordersICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing31,2473
otherOther - PG systemCardiac disordersICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing01,2530
otherUnable to convert - DefibrillationCardiac disordersICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing11,2471
otherUnable to convert - DefibrillationCardiac disordersICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing21,2532
otherElevated DFT - DefibrillationCardiac disordersICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing01,2470
otherElevated DFT - DefibrillationCardiac disordersICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing31,2533

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing
Total, all-cause mortalityICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing
Total, other adverse eventsICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing6251,247
Total, other adverse eventsICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing6321,253
Total, serious adverse eventsICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing7761,247
Total, serious adverse eventsICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing7901,253

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25715991DERIVEDPubMed
26569461DERIVEDPubMed
29157723DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
ICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing vs ICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing: Perioperative Complication RateTrial comparisons
ICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing vs ICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing: First Occurrence of the Composite of Failed First Appropriate Clinical Shock From the Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or Arrhythmic Death
Trial comparisons
ICD Implant Without Defibrillation Testing vs ICD Implant With Defibrillation Testing: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00800384

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00800384/events?page=2