ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00880906-sae

Group A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal Dilatation vs Group B Receives SOC Only: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Group A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal Dilatation vs Group B Receives SOC Only: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00880906-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00880906-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 1000.184wilson
Risk in group 200.00000000000000001390.215wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.2150.184newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Group A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal DilatationGroup A receives steroids and PPI, (SOC) and esophageal dilation.~Esophageal dilation: The esophagus is stretched during the upper endoscopy using Maloney dilators or balloon dilatation.017EG000
Group 2Group B Receives SOC OnlyReceives steroids and PPI only- Does not have esophageal dilation.014EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study of the Efficiency of Esophageal Dilation on Patient With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT number
NCT00880906
Phases
NA
Conditions
Suspected Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Interventions
Esophageal dilation, Steroid and Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt University
Results first posted
2014-05-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00880906-sae