ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT00880906

Study of the Efficiency of Esophageal Dilation on Patient With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

NCT00880906, Not applicable, Completed, Vanderbilt University; results first posted 2014-05-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of the Efficiency of Esophageal Dilation on Patient With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Trials, record NCT00880906. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT00880906

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of the Efficiency of Esophageal Dilation on Patient With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT number
NCT00880906
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
50 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt University
Conditions
Suspected Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Interventions
Esophageal dilation, Steroid and Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy
First posted
2009-04-14
Last updated
2017-11-06
Results first posted
2014-05-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Dysphagia Score in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EE)60 days
Dysphagia Scores: 0 = able to eat normal diet / no dysphagia. 1. = able to swallow some solid foods 2. = able to swallow only semi solid foods 3. = able to swallow liquids only 4. = unable to swallow anything / total dysphagia
SecondaryImmunological Assessment Into the Etiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis60 days

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Dysphagia Score in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EE)60 daysPercent ChangeNUMBER
SECONDARYImmunological Assessment Into the Etiology of Eosinophilic Esophagitis60 daysSaved samples were not analyzed due to there being no difference in the primary outcome measure.

Results by group2

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in Dysphagia Score in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EE)Group A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal Dilatation69Percent Change
Percent Change From Baseline in Dysphagia Score in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EE)Group B Receives SOC Only79Percent Change

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup A Drug Therapy Plus Dilation29
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup B Drug Therapy Only21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup A Drug Therapy Plus Dilation17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup B Drug Therapy Only14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup A Drug Therapy Plus Dilation12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup B Drug Therapy Only7

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal Dilatation
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup B Receives SOC Only
Total, other adverse eventsGroup A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal Dilatation017
Total, other adverse eventsGroup B Receives SOC Only014
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal Dilatation017
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup B Receives SOC Only014

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Group A Receives Routine Care and Esophageal Dilatation vs Group B Receives SOC Only: serious adverse events

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00880906

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT00880906/registered