Comparison · NCT01074047-3e2773f2
Azacitidine (AZA) vs Conventional Care Regimens (CCR): Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Inpatient Hospitalizations
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Azacitidine (AZA) vs Conventional Care Regimens (CCR): Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Inpatient Hospitalizations. Trial comparisons, record NCT01074047-3e2773f2. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01074047-3e2773f2
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.885 | 0.826 | 0.926 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.828 | 0.756 | 0.883 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.057 | -0.0235 | 0.14 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.07 | 0.972 | 1.18 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.6 | 0.823 | 3.11 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Azacitidine (AZA) than on Conventional Care Regimens (CCR) | 17.5 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Azacitidine (AZA) | Azacitidine 75 mg/m2/day by subcutaneous injection \[SC\] for 7 days every 28 days, with a 21 day rest period (optimally for at least 6 cycles) plus best supportive care as needed, including antibiotics and blood product transfusions, growth factors, per physician's discretion. | 139 | 157 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Conventional Care Regimens (CCR) | CCRs included: #1 Intensive Chemotherapy: Cytarabine 100-200 mg/m\^2 as a continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) for 7 days and daunorubicin 45 to 60 mg/m\^² daily (QD) IV on Days 1, 2 and 3 or Idarubicin 9-12 mg/m\^² IV QD for 3 days. Consolidation Therapy (Cycle 2 and 3) = Cytarabine 100-200 mg/m\^2 as a CIVI for 3 to 7 days and daunorubicin 45 to 60 mg/m\^² QD or Idarubicin 9-12 mg/m\^² IV QD on Days 1 and 2. The first consolidation therapy started between Day 28 and Day 70 from start of induction therapy, upon recovery of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) above 1.0 x 10\^9/L and platelets above 75 x 10\^9/L. The second cycle started between Day 28 and Day 70 from start of first consolidation therapy. Best supportive care (BSC) of antibiotics and transfusions, were given as needed # 2 Low-dose cytarabine 20 mg subcutaneously twice a day (BID) for 10 days every 28 days, plus BSC # 3 BSC only = transfusion of blood products, antibiotics, antifungals and nutritional help | 111 | 134 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Inpatient Hospitalizations
- Description
HRU was defined as any consumption of healthcare resources directly or indirectly related to the treatment of the patient. HRU Analysis may help in evaluating potential costs and budget impact of new treatments from a payer perspective.
- Time frame
- Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
- Population
HRU was analyzed for the HRQoL Evaluable Population, a smaller sample than either the ITT population or safety population. Duration of therapy differed between treatment groups. Rate-per-patient year values adjust for these differences.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Study of Vidaza Versus Conventional Care Regimens for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
- NCT number
- NCT01074047
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Interventions
- Azacitidine, Conventional Care Regimen
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Results first posted
- 2015-02-26
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01074047?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01074047-3e2773f2