ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01074047

Study of Vidaza Versus Conventional Care Regimens for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

NCT01074047, Phase 3, Completed, Celgene; results first posted 2015-02-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Vidaza Versus Conventional Care Regimens for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Trials, record NCT01074047. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01074047

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Vidaza Versus Conventional Care Regimens for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NCT number
NCT01074047
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
488 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Celgene
Conditions
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Interventions
Azacitidine, Conventional Care Regimen
First posted
2010-02-24
Last updated
2017-08-29
Results first posted
2015-02-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes33

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall SurvivalDay 1 (randomization) to 40 months
Overall Survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was calculated by the formula: date of death - date of randomization + 1. Participants surviving at the end of the follow-up period or who withdrew consent to follow-up were censored at the date of last contact. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date last known alive.
SecondaryOne-year Overall Survival RateFrom Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
Kaplan Meier methods were used to estimate the 1-year survival probabilities for time to death from any cause. Estimates of the 1-year (365 day) survival probabilities and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented by treatment group. The CI for the difference in the 1-year survival probabilities was derived using Greenwoods variance estimate.
SecondaryEvent-free Survival (EFS)
Day 1 (randomization) to date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after Complete Remission (CR) or Complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), death from any cause. Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
Event-free survival was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), death from any cause, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurs first. Participants who were still alive without any of these events were censored at the date of their last response assessment.
SecondaryRelapse-Free Survival (RFS) for Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)Day 1 of first documented CR or CRi to the date of relapse, death from any cause, or lost to follow-up. Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
Relapse-free survival was defined as the interval from the date of first documented CR or CRi to the date of relapse, death from any cause, or lost to follow-up, whichever occurred first. Participants who were still alive and in continuous CR or CRi were censored at the date of their last response assessment.
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic CR + CRi as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Based on International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
A complete remission (CR) is defined as a leukemia-free state defined as less than 5% blasts in a BM aspirate with marrow spicules and with at least 200 nucleated cells (there should be no blasts with Auer rods), an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of ≥ 1 x 10\^9/L, a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L, and transfusion independence (no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment). No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. A CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) is defined as \<5% BM blasts with the ANC count \< 1 x 10\^9/L and/or the platelet count may be \< 100 x 10\^9/L. Where the date of the hematology assessment used is the earliest on or following the date of the BM sample up to 8 days after the BM date.
SecondaryDuration of Remission Assessed by the IRC Based on Kaplan-Meier EstimatesDay 1 (randomization) to 40 months; date of the first documented CR or CRi until date of first documented relapse.
The time from the date CR or CRi was first documented until the date of documented relapse from CR/CRi. Duration of remission was defined only for those participants who achieved a CR or CRi, as determined by the IRC. Participants who were lost to follow-up without documented relapse, or were alive at last follow-up without documented relapse were censored at the date of their last response assessment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Cytogenetic Complete Response (CRc-10) as Determined by the IRC.Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
The CRc is a normal karyotype defined as no clonal abnormalities after review of at least 10 metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. Cytogenetic complete remission rate (CRc) is when the following criteria are met: 1) CR criteria met and 2) an abnormal karyotype is present at baseline and 3) there is reversion to normal karyotype at the time of CR (based on ≥ 10 metaphases), where date of cytogenetic sample = date of BM sample used for the CR assessment
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Day 1 (randomization) up to last visit completed; final data cut off of 28 Feb 2017
AEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death
Secondary
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
Baseline to Cycle 3; at approximately 3 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in fatigue (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in fatigue (i.e. worsening of symptom).
Secondary
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
Baseline to Cycle 5, at approximately 5 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in fatigue (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in fatigue (i.e. worsening of symptom).

Outcomes33

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall SurvivalDay 1 (randomization) to 40 months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not. Includes participants who died and participants who were censored
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOne-year Overall Survival RateFrom Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not. Includes participants who died and participants who were censored
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYEvent-free Survival (EFS)
Day 1 (randomization) to date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after Complete Remission (CR) or Complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), death from any cause. Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not. Includes participants who died and participants who were censored
monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYRelapse-Free Survival (RFS) for Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)Day 1 of first documented CR or CRi to the date of relapse, death from any cause, or lost to follow-up. Day 1 (randomization) to 40 monthsParticipants who achieved a CR or CRimonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic CR + CRi as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Based on International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not. Includes participants who died and participants who were censored
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration of Remission Assessed by the IRC Based on Kaplan-Meier EstimatesDay 1 (randomization) to 40 months; date of the first documented CR or CRi until date of first documented relapse.Includes those who achieved a CR or CRi and assessed by the IRC; numbers of ITT participants in each treatment groupmonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Achieved a Cytogenetic Complete Response (CRc-10) as Determined by the IRC.Day 1 (randomization) to 40 months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who were randomized, independent of whether they received study treatment or not. Includes participants who died and participants who were censored
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Day 1 (randomization) up to last visit completed; final data cut off of 28 Feb 2017
Safety population = all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had 1 post-dose safety assessment. Because the BSC only regimen consisted of blood products or antibiotics given as needed, those assigned to BSC only were included in the safety population if they had at least 1 post-randomization safety assessment.
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARY
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
Baseline to Cycle 3; at approximately 3 months
The HRQoL Evaluable population included only participants with a baseline QoL assessment and at least 1 follow-up assessment. Time windows were applied post-hoc to increase the size of the analyzable population.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARY
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Domain
Baseline to Cycle 5, at approximately 5 months
The HRQoL Evaluable population included only participants with a baseline QoL assessment and at least 1 follow-up assessment. Time windows were applied post-hoc to increase the size of the analyzable population.
units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group128

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall SurvivalAzacitidine (AZA)10.495% Confidence Interval 8.0 to 12.7months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall SurvivalConventional Care Regimens (CCR)6.595% Confidence Interval 5.0 to 8.6months
One-year Overall Survival RateAzacitidine (AZA)46.595% Confidence Interval 40.1 to 52.7percentage of participants
One-year Overall Survival RateConventional Care Regimen34.395% Confidence Interval 28.3 to 40.3percentage of participants
Event-free Survival (EFS)Azacitidine (AZA)6.795% Confidence Interval 5.0 to 8.8months
Event-free Survival (EFS)Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)4.895% Confidence Interval 3.8 to 6.0months
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) for Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)Azacitidine (AZA)9.395% Confidence Interval 6.7 to 12.4months
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) for Participants Who Achieved a Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission With Incomplete Blood Count Recovery (CRi)Conventional Care Regimen10.595% Confidence Interval 7.3 to 12.3months
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic CR + CRi as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Based on International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Azacitidine (AZA)27.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Morphologic CR + CRi as Determined by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) Based on International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)25.1percentage of participants

Participant flow26

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment PhaseSTARTEDAzacitidine (AZA)241
Treatment PhaseSTARTEDConventional Care Regimens (CCR)247
Treatment PhaseTreated PopulationAzacitidine (AZA)236
Treatment PhaseTreated PopulationConventional Care Regimens (CCR)240
Treatment PhaseSafety PopulationAzacitidine (AZA)236
Treatment PhaseSafety PopulationConventional Care Regimens (CCR)235
Treatment PhaseEvaluable PopulationAzacitidine (AZA)179
Treatment PhaseEvaluable PopulationConventional Care Regimens (CCR)191
Treatment PhaseCOMPLETEDAzacitidine (AZA)24
Treatment PhaseCOMPLETEDConventional Care Regimens (CCR)13

Adverse events1,755

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersAzacitidine41236
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBSC Only340
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersLow-dose Cytarabine32153
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersIntensive Chemotherapy742
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersAzacitidine-extension422
otherFEBRILE NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersAzacitidine28236
otherFEBRILE NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersBSC Only240
otherFEBRILE NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersLow-dose Cytarabine21153
otherFEBRILE NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersIntensive Chemotherapy1242
otherFEBRILE NEUTROPENIABlood and lymphatic system disordersAzacitidine-extension022

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAzacitidine
Total, all-cause mortalityBSC Only
Total, all-cause mortalityLow-dose Cytarabine
Total, all-cause mortalityIntensive Chemotherapy
Total, all-cause mortalityAzacitidine-extension
Total, other adverse eventsAzacitidine226236
Total, other adverse eventsBSC Only3340
Total, other adverse eventsLow-dose Cytarabine151153
Total, other adverse eventsIntensive Chemotherapy4242
Total, other adverse eventsAzacitidine-extension1822

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
25987659DERIVEDPubMed
29241450DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Azacitidine (AZA) vs Conventional Care Regimens (CCR): Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Inpatient HospitalizationsTrial comparisons
Azacitidine (AZA) vs Conventional Care Regimens (CCR): Number of Participants Who Achieved a Cytogenetic Complete Response (CRc-10) as Determined by the IRC.Trial comparisons
Azacitidine (AZA) vs Conventional Care Regimen: HRU: Number of Participants Receiving TransfusionsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01074047

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01074047/registered?page=2