ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT01306331-sae

Conceptrol vs Amphora: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Conceptrol vs Amphora: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT01306331-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT01306331-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01290.008250.02wilson
Risk in group 20.007540.004220.0135wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00532-0.002180.0132newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.710.8143.57log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.710.8133.61log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Conceptrol than on Amphora188from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Conceptrol100 mg (4% concentration) of nonoxynol-9 in 2.5 mL volume of gel~Conceptrol: • Conceptrol® Vaginal Gel, which contains 100 mg (4% concentration) of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) in 2.5 mL volume of gel.191,477EG000
Group 2AmphoraCitric acid USP, potassium bitartrate USP, and L-lactic acid USP~Amphora: • Amphora™ gel, which will be delivered in 5 mL doses, is a clear, water-based, petroleum-free gel.111,458EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
183 days

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study of Contraceptive Efficacy & Safety of Phexxi™ (Previously Known as Amphora) Gel Compared to Conceptrol Vaginal Gel
NCT number
NCT01306331
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Contraception
Interventions
Conceptrol, Amphora
Lead sponsor
Evofem Inc.
Results first posted
2020-07-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT01306331-sae